PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10844863

Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience.

M J Firbank·R M Harrison·E D Williams·A Coulthard
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The aim of this study is to propose guidelines for quality assurance (QA) in MRI, based on a comprehensive assessment of QA parameters undertaken on a busy clinical MRI scanner over the course of 1 year. QA phantoms supplied by the scanner manufacturer were used together with the Eurospin MRI phantom set. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image uniformity were measured daily from spin echo images acquired using a quadrature send-receive head coil and from a gradient echo sequence using the Helmholtz body coil. The voltage of the transmit radiofrequency (RF) amplifier was noted. Monthly measurements of slice thickness, geometric distortion, slice position, image resolution and image ghosting were acquired using the head coil. In addition, SNR was measured monthly on a selection of commonly used coils. Apart from some drift of the RF amplifier voltage, all measurements were within acceptable limits and were stable over the course of 1 year. Satisfactory measurements of SNR were possible using the simple phantom supplied with the scanner. The SNR, geometric distortion and RF amplifier voltage are simple to determine and can be measured in less than 15 min by the scanner operator, using the scanner software. Weekly recording of these parameters is recommended for busy clinical MRI scanners, as this should allow deviations from acceptable limits to be identified early. Such in-house checks can usefully be compared with the less frequent estimations performed by the service engineer. Comprehensive QA routines are discussed for systems used for quantitative measurements.

Explore related subjects

ElectricityEnglandHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareTemperatureTime FactorsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Firbank, R M Harrison, E D Williams, A Coulthard. 2000. Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience.. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.73.868.10844863

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Active alignment of microtubules with electric fields.

The direction of translocation of microtubules on a surface coated with kinesin is usually random. Here we demonstrate and quantify the rate at which externally applied electric fields can direct moving microtubules parallel to the field by deflecting their leading end toward the anode. Effects of electric field strength, kinesin surface density, and microtubule translocation speed on the rate of redirection of microtubules were analyzed statistically. Furthermore, we demonstrated that microtubules can be steered in any desired direction via manipulation of externally applied E-fields.

Electricity↗
PubMed2007

High-performance carbon nanotube field effect transistors with a thin gate dielectric based on a self-assembled monolayer.

Individual single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) field effect transistors (FETs) with a 2 nm thick silane-based organic self-assembled monolayer (SAM) gate dielectric have been manufactured. The FETs exhibit a unique combination of excellent device performance parameters. In particular, they operate with a gate-source voltage of only -1 V and exhibit good saturation, large transconductance, and small hysteresis (<or=100 mV), as well as a very low subthreshold swing (60 mV/dec) under ambient conditions. The SAM-based gate dielectric opens the possibility of fabricating transistors operating at low voltages and constitutes a major step toward nanotube-based flexible electronics.

Electricity↗
PubMed2006

Electromagnetic shielding mats: facts and fiction.

The use of electricity is accompanied by electric and magnetic fields which, intended or not, became a part of our environment. However, fear from environmental electromagnetic fields (EMFs) is widespread and so is business with fear. A number of more or less serious products including miracle products are placed on the market partly at excessive costs. By numerical simulation the efficiency of electromagnetic shielding mats was investigated and claims of manufacturers and their cited expert opinions checked. It could be shown that such products do not fulfil the justified expectations of customers, neither in the extremely low frequency (ELF) nor in the radiofrequency (RF) range. On the contrary, these mats usually make things even worse. The connection to ground, if available, might increase the belief on shielding efficiency, but in fact it even enhances fields instead of improving shielding. The electric conductivity of the mat material plays a minor role in the ELF range and enhances field increase in the RF range. It can not explain the enormous price differences. It could be shown that positive reports can be explained by result picking and exceptional arrangements of selected field sources. Overall, the investigation showed that manufacturer's claims about the shielding effectiveness are misleading and fool the customers about the real situation. Therefore, acquisition and use of electromagnetic shielding mats must be strongly discouraged.

Electricity↗