PubMed · 10846523
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Costa. 1995. [Embracing change].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10846523/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Klinefelter syndrome is the most commonly diagnosed sex chromosome disorder among males. It is usually associated with 47 chromosomes, including two Xs and one Y. The formal cytogenetic designation for Klinefelter syndrome is 47, XXY; the extra sex chromosome is due to meiotic chromosomal nondisjunction. Increased risk of various malignant diseases has been recognized among patients with different congenital chromosomal abnormalities. Since the early 1960s, numerous reports have appeared of an increased risk of malignant neoplasms among patients with Klinefelter syndrome. Evidence suggests a correlation with increased incidences of germ cell tumors and breast cancers. Whether these patients are at an increased risk of hematologic malignant disease, especially acute leukemia, is still uncertain. This report describes a patient with agnogenic myeloid metaplasia and Klinefelter syndrome, an association not previously reported.
The Knudson "two-hit" hypothesis has provided the rationale for studies that aim to identify tumor-suppressor genes by mapping regions of allelic loss (loss of heterozygosity, LOH). Although LOH has been found in practically all types of tumors, very few such projects have been successful in identifying their tumor-suppressor targets. The prime explanation for this failure is probably that researchers have, in general, been too credulous about the two-hit hypothesis, and too willing to ignore factors such as intratumor heterogeneity, contamination by normal cells, karyotypic complexity, homozygous deletions, gene dosage changes, and polymerase chain reaction artifacts. We suggest ways of minimizing these problems. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that existing or newer methods, such as genomic microarrays and in situ single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis, will solve the difficulties of LOH analysis. The future prospects for LOH studies are, as ever, uncertain.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.