PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10847572

A practical EMG-based human-computer interface for users with motor disabilities.

A B Barreto·S D Scargle·M Adjouadi
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In line with the mission of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (ATA), this study proposes an integrated assistive real-time system which "affirms that technology is a valuable tool that can be used to improve the lives of people with disabilities." An assistive technology device is defined by the ATA as "any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities." The purpose of this study is to design and develop an alternate input device that can be used even by individuals with severe motor disabilities. This real-time system design utilizes electromyographic (EMG) biosignals from cranial muscles and electroencephalographic (EEG) biosignals from the cerebrum's occipital lobe, which are transformed into controls for two-dimensional (2-D) cursor movement, the left-click (Enter) command, and an ON/OFF switch for the cursor-control functions. This HCI system classifies biosignals into "mouse" functions by applying amplitude thresholds and performing power spectral density (PSD) estimations on discrete windows of data. Spectral power summations are aggregated over several frequency bands between 8 and 500 Hz and then compared to produce the correct classification. The result is an affordable DSP-based system that, when combined with an on-screen keyboard, enables the user to fully operate a computer without using any extremities.

Explore related subjects

Biofeedback, PsychologyElectroencephalographyElectromyographyEquipment DesignEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMotor Skills DisordersSelf-Help DevicesSensitivity and SpecificitySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedUser-Computer InterfaceJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A B Barreto, S D Scargle, M Adjouadi. A practical EMG-based human-computer interface for users with motor disabilities.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10847572/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Effect of preoperative biofeedback/pelvic floor training on continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preoperative biofeedback training improves urinary continence overall or the rate of return of continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. METHODS: One hundred men scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy were randomized to receive graded pelvic muscle exercise training with biofeedback 2 to 4 weeks before surgery or to a control group performing pelvic muscle exercises without biofeedback. The biofeedback group was instructed to continue exercises four times per day until surgery and to resume exercises when the urethral catheter was removed following surgery. The control group received written and brief verbal instructions in pelvic muscle exercises before surgery and again after catheter removal. Urinary continence was assessed by personal or phone interviews. RESULTS: Six months following surgery, the continence rates, as defined by the use of one pad or less per day, were 94% (44 of 47) and 96% (48 of 50) in the biofeedback and control groups, respectively (P = 0.596). Also, the rate of return as determined at time points 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after surgery was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative biofeedback training did not improve the outcome of pelvic muscle exercises on overall continence or the rate of return of urinary control in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗
PubMed2000

Why can't you tickle yourself?

It is well known that you cannot tickle yourself. Here, we discuss the proposal that such attenuation of self-produced tactile stimulation is due to the sensory predictions made by an internal forward model of the motor system. A forward model predicts the sensory consequences of a movement based on the motor command. When a movement is self-produced, its sensory consequences can be accurately predicted, and this prediction can be used to attenuate the sensory effects of the movement. Studies are reviewed that demonstrate that as the discrepancy between predicted and actual sensory feedback increases during self-produced tactile stimulation there is a concomitant decrease in the level of sensory attenuation and an increase in tickliness. Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that this sensory attenuation might be mediated by somatosensory cortex and anterior cingulate cortex: these areas are activated less by a self-produced tactile stimulus than by the same stimulus when it is externally produced. Furthermore, evidence suggests that the cerebellum might be involved in generating the prediction of the sensory consequences of movement. Finally, recent evidence suggests that this predictive mechanism is abnormal in patients with auditory hallucinations and/or passivity experiences.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗