PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10863122

The Glasgow coma scale.

Abstract

Teasdale and Jennett first presented the Glasgow Coma Scale in 1974 as an aid in the clinical assessment of unconsciousness. It was devised as a formal scheme to overcome the ambiguities and misunderstandings that arose when information about comatose patients was presented and groups of patients were compared. Since then, the Glasgow Coma Scale has been used extensively, being used to grade individual patients, compare effectiveness of treatments, and as a prognostic indicator. It has been incorporated into numerous trauma and critical illness classification systems. However, a number of competing scales have been developed to overcome its perceived deficiencies. These scales are generally more complex. One of the expressed reservations regarding the Glasgow Coma Scale has been its failure to incorporate brainstem reflexes. The scale also includes a numerical skew toward the motor response. An important current issue is the appropriate application of the Glasgow Coma Scale to intubated patients. A number of approaches have been used to assign the verbal score to such patients. The timing of initial scoring is another area of discussion. Despite its drawbacks, the Glasgow Coma Scale remains the most universally utilized level of consciousness scale worldwide. It seems destined to be used in emergency medicine for some time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G L Sternbach. 2000. The Glasgow coma scale.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-4679(00)00182-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Should transient loss of consciousness in blunt head trauma be a pre-hospital trauma triage criterion?

The objective of this study was to evaluate pre-hospital triage of patients with an isolated brief loss of consciousness (LOC) to a regional trauma center (RTC). Data from a 6-month period were retrospectively reviewed from an existing pre-hospital data collection set. Patients were included if either they or a witness claimed a LOC, but they had regained consciousness to at least a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) > 13 by the time the paramedics arrived. Endpoints for need for trauma center services included positive head computed tomography (CT) scan, the occurrence of emergency non-orthopedic surgery in < 6 h, admission to a surgical intensive care unit (ICU), or a length of stay (LOS) greater than 3 days for surgical evaluation. There were 655 complete records available for 275 cases of vehicular trauma and 380 cases of non-vehicular trauma. There were 170 (62%) patients in the vehicular group, and 287 (76%) in the non-vehicular group evaluated in the emergency department and discharged. In the vehicular group, only one (0.4%) patient required operative intervention in less than 6 h, three (1.1%) had a positive head CT scan, 10 (3.6%) were admitted to a surgical ICU, and four (1.5%) had a LOS > 3 days. In the non-vehicular trauma group, only one (0.3%) had surgery in < 6 h, eight (2.1%) had a positive CT scan, six (1.6%) were admitted to a surgical ICU or had a LOS > 3 days. Overall, 19 (2.9%, CI 0.018-0.045) patients met any one of the end-point criteria for trauma center utilization; however, only one patient (0.2% CI < 0.0001-0.008) required immediate neurosurgical intervention. Transient LOC, in the absence of any other American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma triage criteria, triaged 97% of patients to a trauma center, who did not require trauma center services based on our criteria.

Glasgow Coma Scale↗