PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10864222

Systemic therapy emergencies.

Abstract

Systemic oncologic therapies can cause multiple emergency situations. There are, however, two unique emergencies directly related to chemotherapy administration: drug extravasation and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Most drugs can cause varying degrees of local tissue injury when extravasated. The medical management of extravasation is based on proper maintenance of the intravenous line, application of local cooling or warming for certain extravasations, and the use of antidotes to prevent the local toxic action of the extravasated drug. Antidotes that appear useful include hyaluronidase (for vinca alkaloids, epipodophyllotoxins, and paclitaxel), sodium thiosulfate (for mechlorethamine and cisplatin), and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (for anthracyclines and mitomycin C). HSRs, another potential adverse effect of chemotherapy administration, are a major concern for therapy with taxanes and with L-asparaginase, and their administration requires the use of premedication to prevent these reactions. Once a HSR has occurred, therapy may be continued by using an analog drug or by the administration of premedication as prophylaxis, in particular if the reaction was minor. On the other hand, it is also pertinent to become acquainted with the emergencies induced by biological agents, taking into consideration their increasing usages. In addition to interferons and interleukin-2 (IL-2), both of which have been in clinical use for several years, cytokine-toxin fusion proteins (DAB3891L-2) and two monoclonal antibodies (rituximab and trastuzumab) were recently approved for cancer therapy. The distinct toxicity profiles of these agents are reviewed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Albanell, J Baselga. 2000. Systemic therapy emergencies.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10864222/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene (NAG-1) is induced by genistein through the expression of p53 in colorectal cancer cells.

Genistein is an isoflavenoid found in soy that has anti-tumorigenic activities. Treatment of colorectal carcinoma HCT-116 cells with 50 microM genistein results in a 50% reduction in cell proliferation and a 6-fold increase in apoptosis. Genistein induces nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene 1 (NAG-1), a protein with antitumorigenic activities, in a time- and concentration-dependent manner in HCT-116 cells. In addition, p53 and p21 are induced in HCT-116 cells. The induction of p53 (3 hr) precedes the induction of NAG-1 (12 hr), suggesting that genistein-induced NAG-1 expression is mediated by p53. In contrast, NAG-1 is not induced by genistein in the p53-negative colorectal carcinoma cell line HCT-15. Luciferase reporter constructs of the NAG-1 promoter containing 2 p53 sites showed that the p53 sites within the NAG-1 promoter are critical to genistein-induced NAG-1 expression in p53-positive U2OS cells. The expression of p53 was critical for NAG-1 promoter activity since no promoter activity was observed with genistein treatment in HCT-15 cells. However, genistein-induced promoter activity was restored in HCT-15 cells by transfection with wild-type p53. Together our data suggest a relationship between genistein, p53 and NAG-1 forming a novel pathway responsible for the antitumorigenic activity of genistein.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Development of resistance to a trinuclear platinum complex in ovarian carcinoma cells.

BBR3464 is a trinuclear platinum complex that exhibits a potent cytotoxicity and efficacy against cisplatin-resistant tumors. To better understand the determinants of cellular resistance to BBR3464, we selected a resistant ovarian carcinoma cell line after exposure to the complex. The resistant cells (A2780/BBR3464) exhibited a high level of resistance to the selecting agent, but a marginal cross-resistance to cisplatin. Although cellular accumulation of BBR3464 was similar in parental and in resistant cells, DNA platination was decreased in A2780/BBR3464 cells, suggesting a reduced drug accessibility to DNA. This behavior reflected a partial drug inactivation at cytoplasmic level, as a consequence of increased levels of nucleophilic molecules including metallothioneins and human neurofilament low, but not glutathione. A2780/BBR3464 cells also exhibited a reduced susceptibility to apoptosis, which was consistent with reduced expression of Bax, and an alteration of DNA mismatch repair system, as reflected by lack of expression of MLH1 and PMS2, which could impair the recognition/repair of DNA lesions. Whereas both platinum drugs induced G2/M arrest in the parental cells, BBR3464, but not cisplatin, caused a late G1 arrest of resistant cells. Cisplatin induced an appreciable increase of p21(WAF1) levels in both models, in contrast to BBR3464 that produced a substantial upregulation of p21(WAF1) only in parental cells. An inverse relationship with p21(WAF1) modulation was found for CHK1 in parental cells treated with both agents and in resistant cells treated with cisplatin. This pattern of response is consistent with a regulatory loop involving p53 and p21(WAF1) at G2 checkpoint. In contrast, no modulation of CHK1 was found in A2780/BBR3464 treated with the triplatinum compound. These findings, indicating a different activation of regulatory pathways at DNA damage checkpoints in response to cisplatin and BBR3464, support an altered ability of resistant cells to recognize or tolerate sublethal lesions induced by BBR3464.

Antineoplastic Agents↗