PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10869764

A simple and reliable method to simulate multileaf-plans.

Abstract

To combine conformity of the irradiation with time effectiveness during treatment, the use of multileaf collimators has become more and more common. However, the simulation of the leaf positions is rather difficult compared with metal blocks. We developed a new method, utilizing an acrylic template in which the contour produced by the leaves is machined in the form of a 1 mm groove by a computerized numerically controlled milling machine. This template is then inserted into a mount attached to the simulator. The main advantages are the errorfree, direct communication from the therapy planning system to the milling machine via a network, the possibility to transfer the contour to the skin, and the documentation on the simulation film. The use of templates is reliable and, e.g. the costs of the materials are lower than for block simulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W W Baus, M Brauns, K Müller-Sievers, B Kober. 2000. A simple and reliable method to simulate multileaf-plans.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00186-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessment of the acceptability of the Elekta multileaf collimator (MLC) within the Corvus planning system for static and dynamic delivery of intensity modulated beams (IMBs).

The sliding window technique used for static and dynamic segmentation of intensity modulated beams is evaluated. Dynamic delivery is preferred since the resulting distributions correspond better with the calculated distributions, the treatment beam is used more efficiently and the delivery is less sensitive to small variations in the accuracy of the multileaf collimator (MLC).

Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted↗

Dosimetric characteristics of a double-focused miniature multileaf collimator.

The dosimetric characteristics of a double-focused miniature multileaf collimator (mMLC) attached to a Philips SL75/5 linear accelerator (linac) have been investigated. Output factors, percentage depth-dose, penumbra, leaf transmission, and leakage between the leaves were measured for the 6 MV x-ray beam on this accelerator. Because leakage both through and between the leaves is minimal, the linac jaws can be kept fixed while the mMLC leaf configuration is modified for different aperture shapes. This allows for accurate output prediction using the equivalent square formalism. Percent depth-dose measured for fields defined by the mMLC show little deviation from the percent depth-dose measured for fields defined by the machine jaws or Lipowitz metal blocks. Because the mMLC matches beam divergence in both directions, allows minimal beam transmission, and has a large source-to-collimator distance, the penumbra is sharper for fields defined by the mMLC than for fields defined by the linac jaws or Lipowitz metal blocks. Based on these data, dose calculations for mMLC-defined fields can be applied with no change in procedures from those used for fields defined using conventional methods.

Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted↗

Treatment planning for enhanced dynamic wedge with the CMS focus/Modulex treatment planning system.

The current versions of the CMS treatment planning systems, the FOCUS system for three dimensional planning, and Modulex for two dimensional planning, both require modeling dynamic wedges as filters. In this paper we describe methods for generating dynamic wedge filters for treatment planning. In our previous work with dynamic wedge we used measured data to back project the filter that would have delivered the wedge shaped isodoses. With the current version of Enhanced Dynamic Wedge, we use the segmented treatment table (STT) to create filters. For each wedge angle we created a 30 cm filter, for which the field is truncated by blocks according to the dynamic jaw settings. We found the filters provided isodoses that were within 2 degrees of the measured angles. Central axis dose was within 1% due to the fact the system does not account for beam hardening. Although an undesirable solution to model dynamic wedging, we found the filter method to be workable.

Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted↗