PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10889423

Contrast sensitivity assessment using the visual performance tester.

C Argento·M J Cosentino·E Rodriguez
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The visual performance tester (VPT), a device that uses patient response time as a variable to assess visual power, is described. Results in 126 emmetropic eyes that had not had surgery are presented. The VPT provides more complete and accurate information about visual performance than the standard visual acuity examination because the device considers all variables involved in visual function results.

Explore related subjects

Contrast SensitivityElectronic Data ProcessingEquipment DesignHumansPhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsVision TestsComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Argento, M J Cosentino, E Rodriguez. 2000. Contrast sensitivity assessment using the visual performance tester.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00428-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

High temporal frequency synchrony is insufficient for perceptual grouping.

We used textures of randomly moving grating patches to assess the role of fine-grain temporal synchrony in texture segregation. In the target area, patches reversed direction simultaneously. In the surround, patches changed direction at random times. Thus, phase changes in the target area were precisely synchronous, whereas those in the surround were not. In agreement with work carried out by Lee and Blake, we found that the target area was frequently visible, and that observers could discriminate its shape (horizontal versus vertical) at frame rates of 100 Hz in brief exposures (200 ms). Further experiments suggested that the length of unidirectional motion sequences in the target area, rather than synchrony, determined its visibility. To eliminate completely contrast and motion cues, we made all the background elements identical to the target elements, but with a random starting phase. Despite the presence of synchrony in the target area but not the background, the target was generally very hard to see. Targets that remained visible contained low temporal frequency modulations of direction. We conclude that the human observer can detect synchrony, but only at modest temporal frequencies once motion and contrast artefacts have been eliminated.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2002

Effect of spatial waveform on apparent spatial frequency.

We examined the effect of spatial waveform on the perceived spatial frequency of a grating target. The luminance profile of 0.5 c/ degrees sinusoidal gratings was modified by either compressive or expansive power functions, and was presented alternately with a true sinusoidal grating. Subjects matched the apparent spatial frequency of the two gratings using a method of adjustment. Both compressive and expansive power functions lowered the perceived spatial frequency of the grating, irrespective of the stimulus contrast. Rectified sine wave gratings were also found to reduce apparent spatial frequency. The magnitude of the spatial frequency shifts with spatial waveform diminished with successive matches, which may represent a change in matching strategy employed by observers. Calculations and a further experiment suggest that judgements of spatial frequency may in part be determined by the separation between edges in a grating.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2002

Perceptual learning of luminance contrast detection: specific for spatial frequency and retinal location but not orientation.

Performance of a wide range of simple visual tasks improves with practice. Here we ask whether such learning occurs for the fundamental visual task of luminance contrast detection. In two experiments we find that contrast sensitivity increases following extensive practice at detecting briefly presented sinusoidal luminance gratings and that learning is maintained after six months. Learning is spatial frequency tuned, specific to retinal location and can be specific to one eye, but is not selective for orientation. The selectivity of learning implies that it is based on plasticity in early visual, as opposed to central cognitive, processing mechanisms.

Contrast Sensitivity↗