PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10893073

Retinopathy of prematurity, a decrease in frequency and severity. Trends over 16 years in a Danish county.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyse the trends over 16 years (1982-97) in a Danish county regarding the clinical appearance of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODS: The data for birth years 1993-97 regarding the regular ophthalmic surveillance for ROP in the region have been analysed. With gestational age (GA) 32 weeks and/or a birthweight (BW) 1750 g as attempted screening limits a total of 177 premature infants were surveyed. Comparison was made with studies of a similar set-up from the preceding four 3-year periods comprising a total of 814 subjects. RESULTS: The number of survivors regarded at a higher risk of developing ROP (GA and BW both <32 weeks/1750 g, n=478) showed an even increase over the five investigation periods. The ROP frequency, however, fell from a level of 39% to 10%, there were fewer with severe sequels to ROP, and the children surveyed 'above limits' eventually avoided ROP. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ROP profile as a yardstick for the quality of the neonatal service given to the most immature newborns over the period 1982-97, the risk limits regarding GA and BW have gone down. More and more of the heavier preterm babies now escape ROP. A significant decrease in frequency of ROP in the more immature groups has been observed, and fewer cases have progressed to visual impairment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H C Fledelius, H Dahl. 2000. Retinopathy of prematurity, a decrease in frequency and severity. Trends over 16 years in a Danish county.. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078003359.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The relation between the availability of neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality.

BACKGROUND: There is marked regional variation in the availability of neonatal intensive care in the United States. We conducted a study to determine whether a greater supply of neonatologists or neonatal intensive care beds is associated with lower neonatal mortality. METHODS: We used the 1996 master files of the American Medical Association and the American Osteopathic Association and 1998 and 1999 surveys of neonatal intensive care units to calculate the supply of neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds in 246 neonatal intensive care regions. We used linked birth and death records from the 1995 U.S. birth cohort to assess associations between the supply of both neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds per capita (in quintiles) and the risk of death within the first 27 days of life. RESULTS: Among 3,892,208 newborns with a birth weight of 500 g or greater, the mortality rate was 3.4 per 1000 births. After adjustment for neonatal and maternal characteristics associated with an increased risk of neonatal death, the rate was lower in the regions with 4.3 neonatologists per 10,000 births than in those with 2.7 neonatologists per 10,000 births (odds ratio for death, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.99). Further increases in the number of neonatologists were not associated with greater reductions in the risk of death. There was no consistent relation between the number of neonatal intensive care beds and neonatal mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of regions in the United States may have inadequate neonatal intensive care resources, whereas many others may have more resources than are needed to prevent the death of high-risk newborns. The effect of the availability of neonatologists on other health outcomes is not known.

Birth Weight↗

[Quality control of ultrasound weight estimation in a central hospital].

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to carry out a quality control of fetal weight estimated by ultrasonography in an obstetric ward of a district hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 105 scannings. The weight estimates were projected to the date of birth, and the difference in percentage between the actual birth weight and the projected weight was estimated. RESULTS: There was a good agreement between the projected weight and the actual birth weight (r = 0.87). The mean value was -2.5%, and the standard deviation in the difference between the projected weight estimates and the actual birth weight, was 11%, which was consistent with findings in other studies. DISCUSSION: Ongoing quality control of weight estimates and establishment of obstetric databases are recommended.

Birth Weight↗