PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10894661

Expert thinking in nursing practice: implications for supporting expertise.

C Peden-McAlpine
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The complexity of the art of expert nursing practice is an elusive phenomenon, which is difficult to articulate in concrete terms that can be translated into achieving quality patient care outcomes. The present study describes the findings of two hermeneutic (interpretive) studies on expert thinking that captured the holistic practice of expert clinicians. The findings from these studies provide insight into how expert practice can be administratively supported. These findings also have strong implications for strategies to facilitate the development of expertise in practice. In order to provide holistic care, nurses must spend time with their patients so that the particularities and meaning inherent in each unique patient situation can be understood. The art of expert thinking is a temporal and ethical activity, which needs to be supported and cultivated in a changing health-care delivery system.

Explore related subjects

Ethics, NursingHolistic NursingHumansNurse-Patient RelationsNursing Methodology ResearchNursing ProcessProfessional CompetenceSocial SupportThinkingTime FactorsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Peden-McAlpine. 1999. Expert thinking in nursing practice: implications for supporting expertise.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00014.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Developing a mid-range theory of patient advocacy through concept analysis.

AIM: The aim of this paper is to clarify and refine the concept of patient advocacy through synthesizing the advocacy literature in nursing and to establish a theoretical basis for future studies on patient advocacy in nursing. BACKGROUND: Patient advocacy is an essential component of the Registered Nurse professional role. During the past 30 years, the patient advocacy role has become more important, but the concept of patient advocacy lacks a consistent definition and research into nurses' patient advocacy roles is limited. There have been few quantitative empirical studies on patient advocacy in nursing. METHOD: Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was used as a guideline in examining the concept of patient advocacy through synthesizing the advocacy literature in English (1974-2006). FINDINGS: A mid-range theory of patient advocacy emerges during the process of synthesizing and analysing the advocacy literature. Three core attributes of the concept of patient advocacy are identified: (1) safeguarding patients' autonomy; (2) acting on behalf of patients; and (3) championing social justice in the provision of health care. They reflect nurses' patient advocacy roles at both macro- and micro-social levels. Antecedents of patient advocacy occur at both macro- and micro-social levels and call for nurses' advocacy roles in the healthcare system. Consequences produced by nurses' patient advocacy behaviours are contextual. Nurses' patient advocacy behaviours not only can positively influence the patients, other nurses and the nursing profession, but also can cause negative consequences for nurses who take action to advocate for patients. CONCLUSION: The proposed mid-range theory may be useful in guiding advocacy practice in nursing and in guiding research in the advocacy area. The proposed theory needs to be furthered refined and tested in the future.

Ethics, Nursing↗