PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10897712

Case study approach to peripherally inserted central catheters.

Abstract

This article looks at the referral of a patient (Mr H) for parenteral nutrition and the subsequent insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) by the nutrition nurse (NN). It explores the issues directly related to the PICC insertion including the route of intravenous access, the ability of the NN to insert the PICC, preparation, communication and consent, and prevention of the mechanical and septic complications of insertion. This case study demonstrates a good technical mastery of PICC insertion in relation to the issues raised. Mr H was satisfied with his care, offering positive feedback at follow-up visits to clinic. Critical analysis of the case study also revealed implications for further development of the role of the NN in ordering the check X-ray and the development of evidence-based standards and guidelines related to this procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Arrowsmith. Case study approach to peripherally inserted central catheters.. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.1999.8.18.6486

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Strict infection control measures do not prevent clonal spread of coagulase negative staphylococci colonizing central venous catheters in neutropenic hemato-oncologic patients.

Coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are a main cause of catheter related infections (CRI). Earlier studies (1994-1996) revealed a high incidence of CRI (6 per 1000 catheter days) among neutropenic hemato-oncologic patients in the Erasmus MC Hematology Department (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). This was mainly explained by expansion of two methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) clones (Nouwen et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 36 (1998) 2696-2702). In a new, 16-bed unit in the same institution, we investigated the effect of strict clinical isolation measures on the incidence of CRI. During two 6-month screening periods (period I: April 1998-December 1998 and period II: April 1999-October 1999) all patients receiving a central venous catheter were prospectively monitored for the development of CRI. During period I every visitor of the cubicles had to wear hair caps, masks, gowns and gloves. During period II these procedures were abolished, but hands were cleansed using alcohol and masks were worn during both periods in case of coughing and sneezing. All CoNS strains isolated from blood cultures were genetically classifies by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The incidence of CRI during period I was 13.0 per 1000 catheter days, in comparison to 9.6 in period II (P=0.84). During this latter period, 19 CRI were diagnosed, 14 catheter related bacteremia episodes (CRB) and five local infections. Seventy-two percent (n=9) of CRB were due to a CoNS. The mean catheter survival until appearance of a CRI increased from 43 days during period I to 78 days in period II (P=0.39). The mean catheter survival until infection related removal was increased from 43 days to 133 days (P=0.12). During period I less experienced intervention radiologists introduced the catheters, which may have limited the efficacy of the strict hygiene measures. Thus, abolishing strict isolation precautions had no negative effect on the incidence of CRI. After genotyping of 38 MRSE strains isolated from blood and central venous catheter cultures of 12 patients in period II, eight PFGE types were found. Three types were found in more than one patient, but based on epidemiological data patient-to-patient spread could not be proven. No genotypic identity between patient and personnel CoNS isolates was shown and the two major clonal types that were present between 1994 and 1996 were not encountered. However, from December 1998 onwards new MRSE clones could be identified (types E and J). In conclusion, despite a constant rate of CRI and implementation of optimal patient care, clonal spread of MRSE strains was not prevented by strict hygiene measures.

Catheterization, Central Venous↗

Use of semiautomatic treatment advice to improve compliance with Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of intravascular catheter-related infection: a before-after study.

In a large university hospital, the rate of noncompliance with the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) was 44% during 52 consecutively observed episodes of CRBSI. To decrease noncompliance, the physicians who provided care to the next 46 patients with CRBSI received standardized treatment advice by electronic mail. This simple and not labor-intensive intervention decreased guideline noncompliance from 44% to 15% (P<.01).

Catheterization, Central Venous↗

Central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections in neutropenic patients--guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO).

Catheter-related infections cause considerable morbidity in hospitalised patients. The incidence does not seem to be higher in neutropenic patients than in non- neutropenic patients. Gram-positive bacteria (coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus) are the most frequently cultured pathogens, followed by Candida species. In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria play only a minor role in catheter-related infections. Positive blood cultures are the cornerstone in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections, while local signs of infection are only rarely present. However, a definite diagnosis generally requires the removal of the catheter and its microbiological examination. The role plate method with semiquantitative cultures (Maki) has been established as standard in most laboratories. Other standard procedures use quantitative techniques (Sherertz, Brun-Buisson) and are more sensitive. For therapy of catheter-related infections, antibiotics are administered according to the susceptibility of the cultured organism. Routine administration of gylcopepticed antibiotics is not indicated. Removal of the catheter has to be considered in any case of suspected catheter-related infection and is obligatory in Staphylococcus aureus and Candida infections. Tunnel or pocket infection of long-term catheters is always an indication for removal. In the future, the rate of catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients may be reduced by the use of catheters coated with antimicrobial agents.

Catheterization, Central Venous↗