PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10900818

Assessing differential functioning in a satisfaction scale.

Abstract

In this study, an item response theory-based differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) framework (N. S. Raju, W. J. van der Linden, & P. F. Fleer, 1995) was applied to a Likert-type scale. Several differential item functioning (DIF) analyses compared the item characteristics of a 10-item satisfaction scale for Black and White examinees and for female and male examinees. F. M. Lord's (1980) chi-square and the extended signed area (SA) measures were also used. The results showed that the DFIT indices consistently performed in the expected manner. The results from Lord's chi-square and the SA procedures were somewhat varied across comparisons. A discussion of these results along with an illustration of an item with significant DIF and suggestions for future DIF research are presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W C Collins, N S Raju, J E Edwards. 2000. Assessing differential functioning in a satisfaction scale.. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Common charge-shift mutation Glu65Lys in K+ channel β₁-Subunit KCNMB1: pleiotropic consequences for glomerular filtration rate and progressive renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a heritable trait, and hyperfiltration (GFR increment in remnant nephrons) may accelerate renal functional decline in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Mesangial and vascular smooth myocytes control GFR by contraction, dependent on voltage-gated Ca(2+) influx, which is controlled by the regulatory β₁-subunit (KCNMB1) of large-conductance heteromeric K+ ('BK') channels. KCNMB1 gain-of-function variant Glu65Lys results in generalized vasorelaxation and thus protection against systemic hypertension. Here we asked whether the Glu65Lys variant influences GFR, in the basal state or during progressive renal decline. METHODS: We explored Glu65Lys effects on GFR in three populations spanning two ethnicities and two diseases (hypertension and nephrosclerosis). GFR was either estimated (eGFR from serum creatinine) or directly measured (iothalamate clearance). RESULTS: The 65Lys variant was relatively common, occurring on ∼5-10% of chromosomes in different biogeographic ancestry groups, and 65Lys carriers exhibited higher eGFR in two primary care populations: extreme BP values in Kaiser clinics (p = 0.029, accounting for ∼0.2% of trait variance), or treated hypertensives in VA clinics (p = 0.017, accounting for ∼0.9% of trait variance). In blacks with progressive renal disease (NIDDK AASK), 65Lys carriers displayed a steeper slope in GFR chronic decline (p = 0.030, accounting for ∼0.4% of trait variance), and Glu65Lys genotype also predicted time of onset of renal failure (log rank p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Common KCNMB1 gain-of-function variant Glu65Lys influences GFR, and 65Lys carriers exhibit not only elevated baseline GFR, but also more rapid GFR decline (and consequent development of renal failure) in CKD. The results suggest that profiling patients at Glu65Lys can assist in gauging renal prognosis as well as selection of rational therapy in hypertension with progressive renal disease.

Black or African American↗

Markers informative for ancestry demonstrate consistent megabase-length linkage disequilibrium in the African American population.

Admixture mapping is a potentially powerful tool for mapping complex genetic diseases. For application of this method, admixed individuals must have genomes composed of large segments derived intact from each founding population. Such segments are thought to be present in African Americans (AA) and should be demonstrable by examination of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Previous studies using a variety of polymorphic markers have variably reported long-range LD or rapid decay of LD. To further define the extent and characteristics of LD caused by admixture in the AA population, the current study utilized a set of 52 diallelic markers that were selected for large standard variances between putative representatives of the founder populations. LD was examined in over 250 marker-pairs, including linked markers from four different chromosomal regions and an equal number of matched unlinked comparisons. In the representative founder populations, strong LD was not observed for markers separated by more than 10 kb. In contrast, results indicated significant LD ( P<0.001, D'>0.3) in AA over large genomic segments exceeding 10 centiMorgans (cM) and 15 megabases (Mb). Only marginally significant LD was present between unlinked markers in this population, suggesting that choosing appropriate levels of significance for admixture mapping can minimize false positive results. The ability to detect LD for extended chromosomal segments in AA decayed not only as a function of the distance between markers, but also as a function of the standard variance of the markers. This examination of several genomic segments provides strong evidence that appropriate selection of informative markers is a crucial prerequisite for the application of admixture mapping to the AA population.

Black or African American↗

What does "a gene for heart disease" mean? A focus group study of public understandings of genetic risk factors.

There is growing concern in the medical community about potential genetic determinism in the patient population. Limited information about the public understanding of genetic factors in disease formation is available. To access public perceptions of potentially deterministic phrasing of genetic risk factors, we sought to establish interpretations of the phrase, "a gene for heart disease." Focus groups in urban, suburban, and rural communities were conducted from July through October, 2001 in Georgia. A total of 108 participants were recruited. Participants were recruited to balance sex and racial representation. We used three outcome measures for participants understandings of the phrase: (1) participants' statements of the meaning of the phrase; (2) the level of determinism assigned to genetic factors by participants; and (3) participant reports of the health consequences of having "a gene for heart disease." Participants did not report a single interpretation of the phrase. There were dominant participant interpretations under each outcome measure: (1) "a gene for heart disease" was interpreted as meaning genetic and environmental factors both played roles in disease formation; (2) genetic predisposition was perceived as heightened, not absolute, risk; (3) the perceived health impact was a greater risk of becoming sick. Minority interpretations were found under each measure. Overall, naming "a gene for heart disease" does not appear to have a deterministic impact on a plurality of participants' perceptions of risks associated with genetic factors. Genetic fatalism in patient populations may be confined to a sizable minority. Important considerations for provider intervention and patient education are indicated.

Black or African American↗