PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10906882

Posterior interosseous nerve terminal branches.

Abstract

Thirty upper limbs from skeletally mature embalmed cadavers were studied to define the most common pattern of the terminal branches of the posterior interosseous nerve. At 0.43 +/- 0.52 cm from the distal edge of the superficial head of the supinator and 8 +/- 1.6 cm from the lateral epicondyle, the posterior interosseous nerve branches, forming a common leash. There were six branches, which were arranged from the ulnar to the radial side at their origin from the common leash. The first and second branches supplied the extensor digitorum communis, the third branch supplied the extensor carpi ulnaris, the fourth branch supplied the extensor digiti minimi, and the fifth branch arose from the undersurface of the common leash and divided into two branches (medial and lateral) at 10.1 +/- 3.2 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle and 12.8 +/- 2.2 cm proximal to Lister's tubercle. The medial branch supplied the extensor pollicis longus and extensor indicis proprius. The lateral branch supplied the extensor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis and ended at the wrist capsule. The sixth branch arose from the radial side of the common leash and divided into three branches. The first branch supplied the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis. The second branch supplied the abductor pollicis longus. The third branch supplied the superficial head of the supinator. The authors of this study describe the most efficient way to identify the six branches and how to avoid the risk of damaging them during surgical exposure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Elgafy, N A Ebraheim, A T Rezcallah, R A Yeasting. 2000. Posterior interosseous nerve terminal branches.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200007000-00033

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Objective assessment comparing hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although several reports have subjectively highlighted the benefits of hand-assisted as compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, there has been little objective analysis comparing these two techniques. METHODS: For this study, 12 trained laparoscopic surgeons completed standardized knot-tying and dissection tasks in a laparoscopic trainer using both hand-assisted (HandPort) and traditional laparoscopic techniques. Motion analysis with the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device was used to assess performance, measuring the number of movements made, the path length of hand travel, and the time taken. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare hand-assisted (HA) and conventional laparoscopic (L) performance. A p value less than 0.05 was deemed significant. Means and standard deviations are shown in the results. RESULTS: In knot tying, for both the dominant and nondominant hands, hand-assisted rather than conventional laparoscopic techniques resulted in reduced movements (dominant: HA [114 +/- 50] vs L [321 +/- 118, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [89 +/- 36] vs L [296 +/- 96, p < 0.001]); path length (dominant: HA [1,083 +/- 680 mm] vs L [3,637 +/- 1,852 mm, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [549 +/- 339 mm] vs L [2,556 +/- 1,042 mm, p < 0.001]); and time taken (HA [162 +/- 50 s] vs L [460 +/- 179 s, p < 0.001]). However, there was no statistical difference for any measured variable with respect to the dissection task. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted surgery significantly improves the knot-tying ability among trained laparoscopic surgeons. However, there appears to be no improvement in performance for this specific dissection task.

Dissection↗

Rare variation in course and affluence of internal iliac vein due to its anatomical and surgical significance.

During regular dissection of the retroperitoneal region, three uncommon anatomical variations of the internal iliac veins were found on dissected specimens: in the first case, the internal iliac veins converge forming a common trunk draining into the left external iliac vein. In the other two cases, the internal iliac vein crosses the median plane and flows into the contralateral common iliac vein. These anomalies result from a persistence of the embryonic inferior branch of the cardinal vein and are important to be known for they may be undetected or may not appear in imaging. These data have implications for both pelvic surgeons and anatomists who manipulated this anatomical area.

Dissection↗