PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10919419

Cricoid pressure: which hand?

Abstract

We studied 20 anaesthetic assistants applying simulated cricoid pressure with the left or right hand in random order. Simulated cricoid pressure was continued for up to 5 min with one hand and then, after resting, with the other hand. Applied pressure was measured at intervals and the subjects were blind to the results. Nineteen assistants were right-handed and all routinely applied cricoid pressure with their right hand. Mean (SD) force applied during simulated 'awake' cricoid pressure was 13.8 (5.7) N with either left or right hand, and during 'anaesthetised' cricoid pressure it was initially 25.1 (8.2) N and 24.7 (8.8) N with left or right hand, respectively. Mean force was maintained above 20 N and below 30 N throughout the study period with either hand. Force applied with the left hand was significantly lower than with the right hand but the difference was clinically insignificant (0.4 N). Inadequate or excessive force was more frequently associated with use of the left hand (p < 0.0001). Cricoid pressure was released before 5 min in three cases, two left-handed and one right-handed. Our results demonstrate that anaesthetic assistants apply a lower force than is classically taught and are able to maintain the force with either hand for a sustained period. Application with the left hand is justified where clinically indicated but may have a lower margin for error than when applied with the right hand.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T M Cook, I Godfrey, M Rockett, R G Vanner. 2000. Cricoid pressure: which hand?. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01418.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine administration during isoflurane anaesthesia in Shetland ponies.

BACKGROUND: The arterial pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine i.v. administration were evaluated in seven gelding ponies in a crossover study (2-month interval). METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with isoflurane in oxygen via a face-mask and then maintained at each pony's individual MAC. Racemic ketamine (2.2 mg kg(-1)) or S-ketamine (1.1 mg kg(-1)) was injected in the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected from the right carotid artery before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 min after ketamine administration. Ketamine and norketamine enantiomer plasma concentrations were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Individual R-ketamine and S-ketamine concentration vs time curves were analysed by non-linear least square regression two-compartment model analysis using PCNonlin. Plasma disposition curves for R-norketamine and S-norketamine were described by estimating AUC, C(max), and T(max). Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (R(f)), tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume ventilation (V(E)), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PE'(CO(2))), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of S- and R-ketamine administered in the racemic mixture or S-ketamine administered separately did not differ significantly. Statistically significant higher AUC and C(max) were found for S-norketamine compared with R-norketamine in the racemic group. Overall, R(f), V(E), PE'(CO(2)), and MAP were significantly higher in the racemic group, whereas PR was higher in the S-ketamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Norketamine enantiomers showed different pharmacokinetic profiles after single i.v. administration of racemic ketamine in ponies anaesthetised with isoflurane in oxygen (1 MAC). Cardiopulmonary variables require further investigation.

Anesthesia, General↗