PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10926027

Interns' self-evaluations compared with their faculty's evaluations.

Abstract

The accuracy with which individuals evaluate and judge their knowledge and skills is an important component of adult and life-long learning. This study compared the evaluations that interns made of themselves with those made by their faculty.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S C Zonia, M Stommel. 2000. Interns' self-evaluations compared with their faculty's evaluations.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200007000-00020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Elevated substance P levels in HIV-infected men.

The neuropeptide, substance P, is a potent modulator of neuroimmunoregulation. Substance P and its receptor modulate HIV infection. HIV-seropositive men had significantly higher plasma substance P levels compared with uninfected controls, which were associated with decreased CD16 and CD56 natural killer (NK) cell populations. The changes in plasma substance P levels and decreases in NK subsets did not correlate with CD4 cell levels, but a diurnal pattern was suggested for substance P. The balance between substance P expression and functions of immune cells may be important in the immunopathogenesis of HIV infection.

Cohort Studies↗

Diagnostic accuracy and certainty from sequential evaluations in peripheral neuropathy.

Three masked neuromuscular experts analyzed the contribution of the data from sequential evaluations in predicting specific varieties of peripheral neuropathy in 72 patients. The largest improvement (16%) in diagnostic accuracy resulted from presentation of neurologic history. By contrast, diagnostic confidence increased gradually with presentation of additional medical information. Therefore, the authors conclude that for diagnostic accuracy and certainty, expert neuromuscular judgment and extensive characterizing or discriminative testing are needed.

Cohort Studies↗

Effect of revascularization on left ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure from severe chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

Few data exist regarding the effect of revascularization on left ventricular (LV) geometry in patients with severe LV systolic dysfunction and viable myocardium. We hypothesized that patients with chronic ischemic LV dysfunction but viable myocardium will have improved LV geometry after revascularization, which in turn will improve long-term outcome. Accordingly, 70 patients with severe ischemic LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <0.35) were studied at rest. They then either underwent revascularization (n = 36) or were treated medically (n = 34). Fifty-four patients had viable myocardium, and 16 did not. They were evaluated for change in LV function and geometry (size and shape) a mean of 21 months later. Further follow-up was performed for a mean of 3.5 years to determine outcome. Patients with viable myocardium had improvement not only in regional and global function, but also in LV geometry (shape and size), which was independent of and incremental to the improvement in function. On long-term follow-up, change in LV end-systolic volume was the only multivariate discriminator between 15 patients who died and 55 who did not, irrespective of whether they had undergone revascularization. Thus, measurement of the effect of revascularization of viable myocardium in chronic ischemic heart disease should not only include improvement in resting regional and global LV function, but also LV geometry. Improvement in LV geometry contributes to better LV systolic function, which in turn is the best predictor of survival after revascularization.

Cohort Studies↗