PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10927256

X-ray multislice computation using the Moodie-Wagenfeld equations: divergent-beam pattern simulation in three-beam and six-beam Laue cases.

Abstract

Pattern simulations for three-beam and six-beam X-ray diffraction are presented using multislice calculations based on Moodie & Wagenfeld's formulation of the X-ray equations, which factorize Maxwell's equations into Dirac format, using circular-polarization bases. The results are presented in three forms: one-dimensional rocking curves, Pendellösung thickness fringes, and convergent/divergent-beam patterns of single-diffraction orders, using experience gained from CBED (convergent-beam electron diffraction) and LACBED (large-angle CBED) techniques developed for high-voltage electron diffraction transmission patterns. This latter and quite new technique displays the results in the most compact form. The acronym DBXRAD (divergent-beam X-ray diffraction) is used for these patterns. The optics required for these patterns has only recently become available for radiations up to Mo Kalpha(1) in energy and for limited angular divergences, but with capillary focusing currently undergoing rapid development these limits are likely to be extended. However, these simulations define critical angular ranges within reach of current designs. Simulations for light- and heavy-atom structures belonging to the enantiomorphic space-group pair P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 provide clear evidence of chiral interaction between radiation and structure, highlighting divergences from the use in structure analysis of the well studied CBED pattern symmetries. Mo Kalpha(1) and Ta Kalpha(1) wavelengths were used to minimize absorption for the two structures studied, an important factor owing to the large thicknesses (up to 20 mm) required.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Goodman, L Liu. 1999-03-01. X-ray multislice computation using the Moodie-Wagenfeld equations: divergent-beam pattern simulation in three-beam and six-beam Laue cases.. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767398010824

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗