PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10930828

Genetically crosslinked hemoglobin: a structural study.

Abstract

The crystal structures of three recombinant human hemoglobins, rHb1. 0, rHb1.1 and rHb1.2, have been determined in the deoxy state at 1.8 A resolution. Two of the three proteins, rHb1.1 and rHb1.2, contain a genetic fusion of the alpha subunits, a one- or two-glycine link, respectively, whereas rHb1.0 does not. The glycine crosslinks, localized between one N- and C--termini pair of the alpha subunits in the deoxy crystalline state, do not perturb the overall tertiary or quaternary or even the local structure of hemoglobin. Therefore, genetic fusion to prevent the dissociation of the hemoglobin tetramer, thereby inhibiting renal clearance based upon molecular size, is a structurally conservative method to stabilize hemoglobin for use as an oxygen-delivery therapeutic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E A Brucker. 2000. Genetically crosslinked hemoglobin: a structural study.. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444900006557

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The saccharide-hydrazide linkage: molecular and crystal structures of the semicarbazide derivatives of D-glucose, D-galactose, and D-xylose, including a 'forbidden' conformation of the galactose derivative.

The X-ray crystal structures of the semicarbazide derivatives of D-glucose, D-galactose, and D-xylose are described. All are glycopyranosyl derivatives in the solid state. The glucose semicarbazide crystallizes as a dihydrate. Two different conformations of the galactose semicarbazide are found, one having the gg side-chain orientation unfavorable for monosaccharides having the 4C(1)-D-galacto configuration. In the two other known examples, this conformation is stabilized by an intramolecular hydrogen bond, but in the current structure, the hydrogen bonds involving the side chain are intermolecular. In these semicarbazides the N [bond] N [bond] C[double bond] O torsional angle is approximately 180 degrees, in contrast to the angles of 0.60 and 13.9 degrees in the two solid-state conformations of 2-benzoyl-1-(alpha-D-xylopyranosyl)hydrazine [Ernholt, B. V.; Thomsen, I. B.; Lohse, A.; Plesner, I. W.; Jensen, K. B.; Hazell, R. G.; Liang, X.; Jakobsen, A.; Bols, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 278-287]. The water molecules and the carbonyl oxygen are heavily involved in H-bonding.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗

Hierarchy of simulation models in predicting structure and energetics of the Src SH2 domain binding to tyrosyl phosphopeptides.

Structure and energetics of the Src Src Homology 2 (SH2) domain binding with the recognition phosphopeptide pYEEI and its mutants are studied by a hierarchical computational approach. The proposed structure prediction strategy includes equilibrium sampling of the peptide conformational space by simulated tempering dynamics with the simplified, knowledge-based energy function, followed by structural clustering of the resulting conformations and binding free energy evaluation of a single representative from each cluster, a cluster center. This protocol is robust in rapid screening of low-energy conformations and recovers the crystal structure of the pYEEI peptide. Thermodynamics of the peptide-SH2 domain binding is analyzed by computing the average energy contributions over conformations from the clusters, structurally similar to the predicted peptide bound structure. Using this approach, the binding thermodynamics for a panel of studied peptides is predicted in a better agreement with the experiment than previously suggested models. However, the overall correlation between computed and experimental binding affinity remains rather modest. The results of this study show that small differences in binding free energies between the Ala and Gly mutants of the pYEEI peptide are considerably more difficult to predict than the structure of the bound peptides, indicating that accurate computational prediction of binding affinities still remains a major methodological and technical challenge.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗