Structural symmetry and protein function.

D S Goodsell; A J Olson

doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.105

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10940245

Structural symmetry and protein function.

D S Goodsell·A J Olson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The majority of soluble and membrane-bound proteins in modern cells are symmetrical oligomeric complexes with two or more subunits. The evolutionary selection of symmetrical oligomeric complexes is driven by functional, genetic, and physicochemical needs. Large proteins are selected for specific morphological functions, such as formation of rings, containers, and filaments, and for cooperative functions, such as allosteric regulation and multivalent binding. Large proteins are also more stable against denaturation and have a reduced surface area exposed to solvent when compared with many individual, smaller proteins. Large proteins are constructed as oligomers for reasons of error control in synthesis, coding efficiency, and regulation of assembly. Symmetrical oligomers are favored because of stability and finite control of assembly. Several functions limit symmetry, such as interaction with DNA or membranes, and directional motion. Symmetry is broken or modified in many forms: quasisymmetry, in which identical subunits adopt similar but different conformations; pleomorphism, in which identical subunits form different complexes; pseudosymmetry, in which different molecules form approximately symmetrical complexes; and symmetry mismatch, in which oligomers of different symmetries interact along their respective symmetry axes. Asymmetry is also observed at several levels. Nearly all complexes show local asymmetry at the level of side chain conformation. Several complexes have reciprocating mechanisms in which the complex is asymmetric, but, over time, all subunits cycle through the same set of conformations. Global asymmetry is only rarely observed. Evolution of oligomeric complexes may favor the formation of dimers over complexes with higher cyclic symmetry, through a mechanism of prepositioned pairs of interacting residues. However, examples have been found for all of the crystallographic point groups, demonstrating that functional need can drive the evolution of any symmetry.

Explore related subjects

Allosteric Site Animals DNA Dimerization Models, Biological Models, Molecular Protein Binding Protein Conformation Protein Structure, Tertiary Proteins Structure-Activity Relationship Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D S Goodsell, A J Olson. 2000. Structural symmetry and protein function.. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.105

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Helix D elongation and allosteric activation of antithrombin.

Antithrombin requires allosteric activation by heparin for efficient inhibition of its target protease, factor Xa. A pentasaccharide sequence found in heparin activates antithrombin by inducing conformational changes that affect the reactive center of the inhibitor resulting in optimal recognition by factor Xa. The mechanism of transmission of the activating conformational change from the heparin-binding region to the reactive center loop remains unresolved. To investigate the role of helix D elongation in the allosteric activation of antithrombin, we substituted a proline residue for Lys(133). Heparin binding affinity was reduced by 25-fold for the proline variant compared with the control, and a significant decrease in the associated intrinsic fluorescence enhancement was also observed. Rapid kinetic studies revealed that the main reason for the reduced affinity for heparin was an increase in the rate of the reverse conformational change step. The pentasaccharide-accelerated rate of factor Xa inhibition for the proline variant was 10-fold lower than control, demonstrating that the proline variant cannot be fully activated toward factor Xa. We conclude that helix D elongation is critical for the full conversion of antithrombin to its high affinity, activated state, and we propose a mechanism to explain how helix D elongation is coupled to allosteric activation.

Allosteric Site↗

PubMed2001

Binding of exosite ligands to human thrombin. Re-evaluation of allosteric linkage between thrombin exosites I and II.

The substrate specificity of thrombin is regulated by binding of macromolecular substrates and effectors to exosites I and II. Exosites I and II have been reported to be extremely linked allosterically, such that binding of a ligand to one exosite results in near-total loss of affinity for ligands at the alternative exosite, whereas other studies support the independence of the interactions. An array of fluorescent thrombin derivatives and fluorescein-labeled hirudin(54-65) ([5F]Hir(54-65)(SO(3)(-))) were used as probes in quantitative equilibrium binding studies to resolve whether the affinities of the exosite I-specific ligands, Hir(54-65)(SO(3)(-)) and fibrinogen, and of the exosite II-specific ligands, prothrombin fragment 2 and a monoclonal antibody, were affected by alternate exosite occupation. Hir(54-65)(SO(3)(-)) and fibrinogen bound to exosite I with dissociation constants of 16-28 nm and 5-7 microm, respectively, which were changed < or =2-fold by fragment 2 binding. Native thrombin and four thrombin derivatives labeled with different probes bound fragment 2 and the antibody with dissociation constants of 3-12 microm and 1.8 nm, respectively, unaffected by Hir(54-65)(SO(3)(-)). The results support a ternary complex binding model in which exosites I and II can be occupied simultaneously. The thrombin catalytic site senses individual and simultaneous binding of exosite I and II ligands differently, resulting in unique active site environments for each thrombin complex. The results indicate significant, ligand-specific allosteric coupling between thrombin exosites I and II and catalytic site perturbations but insignificant inter-exosite thermodynamic linkage.

Allosteric Site↗

PubMed2001

Dynamics and cooperativity of microtubule decoration by the motor protein kinesin.

We describe a theoretical and experimental analysis of the interaction between microtubules and dimeric motor proteins (kinesin, NCD), with special emphasis on the stoichiometry of the interaction, cooperative effects, and their consequences for the interpretation of biochemical and image reconstruction results. Monomeric motors can bind equivalently to microtubules without interference, at a stoichiometry of one motor head per tubulin subunit (alphabeta-heterodimer). By contrast, dimeric motors can interact with stoichiometries ranging between one and two heads per tubulin subunit, depending on binding constants of the first head and the subsequent binding of the second head, and the concentration of dimers in solution. Further, we show that an attractive interaction between the bound motor molecules can explain the higher periodicities observed in decorated microtubules (e.g. 16 nm periodicity), and the non-uniform decoration of a population of microtubules and give an estimate of the strength of this interaction.

Allosteric Site↗