PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10949782

Genetic testing.

Abstract

New research developments in the molecular genetics of cancer have led to the feasibility of cancer genetic testing. At present, genetic test results can better inform individuals at risk about appropriately tailored strategies for cancer screening and prevention. In the future, more persons will be eligible for genetic evaluation; in particular, if it is shown that patients with cancer who are carriers of germline mutations respond differently to treatments, genetic testing may be warranted. Consideration needs to be given to the appropriate delivery of genetic risk assessment and testing. There is a great potential for misinterpretation of gene test results and for adverse psychosocial consequences for patients. Genetic counseling is an important component in cancer risk assessment and management, particularly in helping persons at risk understand the implications of gene test results in the context of their experience with cancer and surveillance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G M Petersen. 2000. Genetic testing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70320-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process.

When drawn into other parties' litigation or investigations, journals often receive requests or subpoenas for confidential peer review documents. We describe reasons for such requests and reasons that journals resist producing confidential documents, ways that journals respond, and steps that journals can take to minimize third-party breaches of journals' confidential processes. We discuss legal principles on which resistance may be based in the United States, including the journalist's privilege, the scholar's privilege, the burdensomeness of response, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which protect against attempts to obtain expert opinion testimony without compensation. Illustrative cases are described in which courts affirmed the confidentiality of peer review conducted by journals.

Confidentiality↗