PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1095261

A computer-oriented linkage analysis scheme.

Abstract

A comprehensive, computer-oriented scheme for genetic linkage analysis is described. It computes the likelihood of a complex pedigree allowing for many non-standard features including multiple alleles (up to four per locus), multiple mates, more than one mating in the eldest generation, consanguinity, missing or partially tested persons, and different recombination fractions between males and females. The program works by computing weighted likelihoods in a vertical, descending fashion. First, the set of possible genotypes for the members of the eldest generation is determined and prior probabilities assigned to these states of nature (based on gene frequency calculations). Phenotypic information is used to modify these probabilities in the standard manner. Then, for a particular set of genotypes, the conditional likelihood of the remainder of the pedigree is computed. This calculation may itself be many-branched and therefore a computer is necessary to keep track of the stages of the process. When the youngest generation has been taken into account, a final likelihood is determined, reflecting all information in the pedigree. The current version of the program successfully calculates the exact likelihood of a complex pedigree which was designed to exploit the non-standard features of the program. It has also computed likelihoods for a published pedigree, and the results are essentially equal to those obtained by the other authors using a previously available computer scheme for linkage analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L B Freidhoff, G Chase. 1975. A computer-oriented linkage analysis scheme.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb00322.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.

In the international project "Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography" (CSE), diagnostic results of different computer programs for the interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and of the vectorcardiogram (VCG) were combined, and it was shown that the "combined program" performs better than each program separately. Because the program MEANS (Modular ECG Analysis System) comprises 2 different classification programs--one for the ECG, the other for the VCG--this allowed investigation of whether the combined interpretations would yield a better diagnostic result than either one separately. This approach requires that a VCG always be recorded in addition to the ECG. To circumvent this complication, the VCG was reconstructed from the simultaneously recorded ECG leads. This reconstructed VCG was then interpreted by the VCG classification program, whereupon the diagnostic interpretations of the ECG and the reconstructed VCG were combined. For the validation, the CSE database of documented ECGs and VCGs (n = 1,220) was used. The combination of the ECG and VCG interpretations yielded a better diagnostic result than each interpretation program separately (total accuracy 74.2% (ECG + VCG) vs 69.8% (ECG) and 70.2% (VCG), p less than 0.001 in both cases). The results for the reconstructed VCG (total accuracy 70.5%) are comparable to those for the ECG and the VCG (p greater than 0.10 in both cases). The performance of the combined interpretations of ECG and reconstructed VCG (total accuracy 73.6%) is approximately the same as that of the combined ECG and VCG (p greater than 0.10). Thus, the performance of an ECG computer program can be improved by incorporating both ECG and VCG classificatory knowledge, using only the ECG itself.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted

[Potential usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in a mass survey for lung cancer using photo-fluorographic films].

We investigated the potential usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in a mass survey for lung cancer. When the sensitivity of the computer output was adjusted nearly equal to that of the mass survey in our database which contained 198 photofluorographic films, some shadows detected by the computer output were different from those detected by human observers. Therefore, the best estimated sensitivity of an observer using the computer output was equal to or greater than the sensitivity of double reading. It is expected that CAD may have a role in a mass survey for lung cancer using photofluorographic films.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted