PubMed · 10969397
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
O Habler. 2000. [Controlled hypotension].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010070086
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
It is not known how the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) attenuate heart failure (HF) in viable ischemic hearts. To assess HF in a rat coronary stenosis (CS) model, we administered vehicle and quinapril or candesartan (or both) orally for 12 wk. Compared with the sham group, the vehicle group showed impaired myocardial perfusion, impaired coronary endothelial nitric oxide (NO) function in vitro, exhausted myocardial mitochondrial respiration, larger left ventricular (LV) dimensions and lower ejection fraction, lower LV rate of pressure development over time (dP/dt), lower slopes of LV end-systolic pressure-dimension relations (ESPDRs), and increased myocardial fibrosis. Treatment with quinapril or candesartan ameliorated these parameters without modifying the epicardial CS severity. Moreover, their combination maintained similar myocardial perfusion, despite a trend toward lower blood pressure, and showed distinctive neurohumoral modulation, normalized mitochondrial respiration, and increased ESPDR slopes. Thus improved myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve by quinapril or candesartan are the key to alleviate CS-induced HF, and their combination may have a therapeutic significance partly through ameliorated mitochondrial respiration and improved LV systolic function.
Sensitive methods are required to record electrical evoked potentials over the visual cortex to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a retinal prosthesis before it can be implanted on the retinal surface of patients afflicted by outer retinal diseases. This study was designed to examine subdural electrodes as a mean to evaluate cortical evoked potentials in response to light and electrical stimulation of the retina in three dogs under two methods of anesthesia-halothane and propofol. Results showed that subdural electrodes could be stabilized over the visual cortex for several (3-5) months, and that they were 6.95 times more sensitive than subdermal electrodes in recording cortical visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and 4.31 times more sensitive in recording cortical electrical evoked potentials under both methods of anesthesia. The waveforms' shape changed for each electrode in the subdural array during 6/6 (100%) and 20/38 (52%) multi-channel recording sessions under halothane and propofol, respectively. This change could point to a cortical retinotopic organization versus hierarchical organization of different cortical areas for a given retinal stimulus. In summary, subdural electrodes show promising results for recording visual and electrical evoked responses (EERs) and thus for evaluation of the retinal prosthesis.