PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10972757

Grounding policy development within an educational setting: an exploration.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore an approach for informing the development of regional policy by eliciting the considered views of GP participants at an educational event. In particular we discuss the reaction of GP participants to this approach. (In this instance our GP participants were trainers and the evolving policy under discussion was that of 'clinical governance'.) METHOD: An educational event was planned to facilitate discussion and the recording of the considered views of GP trainer participants. The acceptability of this approach to the participants was evaluated via observation and through feedback forms. RESULTS: While observation suggested that the participants were involved in many lively and constructive discussions, the feedback generated showed that many participants felt uncomfortable about the use of an educational event to inform development. DISCUSSION: We recognize the need to inform and facilitate change through the involvement of those who will be participants in the change process. The rapid timescales imposed by change and the 'burden' of additional research involvement on practitioners are issues. Approaches based on action research and participatory research principles may have potential and can throw light on the difficulties we experienced. CONCLUSION: We need to identify approaches which will allow us to ground development within the views of those to be affected by change. Our own attempt demonstrated difficulties. We would welcome further debate over methods and approaches applicable in this border territory between research, development and education.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Bateman, A Hibble, C Hand. 2000. Grounding policy development within an educational setting: an exploration.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00628.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of primary healthcare professionals in oral cancer prevention and detection.

AIM: To investigate current knowledge, examination habits and preventive practices of primary healthcare professionals in Scotland, with respect to oral cancer, and to determine any relevant training needs. SETTING: Primary care. METHOD: Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 357 general medical practitioners (GMPs) and 331 dental practitioners throughout Scotland. Additionally, focus group research and interviews were conducted amongst primary healthcare team members. RESULTS: Whilst 58% of dental respondents reported examining regularly for signs of oral cancer, GMPs examined patients' mouths usually in response to a complaint of soreness. The majority of GMPs (85%) and dentists (63%) indicated that they felt less than confident in detecting oral cancer, with over 70% of GMPs identifying lack of training as an important barrier. Many practitioners were unclear concerning the relative importance of the presence of potentially malignant lesions in the oral cavity. A high proportion of the GMPs indicated that they should have a major role to play in oral cancer detection (66%) but many felt strongly that this should be primarily the remit of the dental team. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a need for continuing education programmes for primary care practitioners in oral cancer-related activities. This should aim to improve diagnostic skills and seek to increase practitioners' participation in preventive activities.

Clinical Competence↗

NVQs.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Clinical Competence↗