PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10979723

Web alert: science museums.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2000. Web alert: science museums.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10979723/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Malaria-GENOMAP: a web-based tool for exploring genomic variation of malaria parasites.

MOTIVATION: Malaria, caused by Plasmodium parasites, imposes a significant public health burden. While Plasmodium falciparum remains the primary target of elimination strategies due to its high mortality rate, lesser-known species such as P. malariae, P. vivax, and P. knowlesi continue to contribute to substantial human morbidity. Genomic approaches, including whole-genome sequencing, offer powerful tools for understanding the biology, transmission, and emerging drug resistance of these neglected Plasmodium species. However, there is an urgent need for informatic tools to summarize and visualize the high-dimensional and complex genomic data generated. RESULTS: We developed Malaria-GENOMAP, a user-friendly web-based tool, which integrates genomic variant data, such as allele frequencies, with geographical maps and chromosome-wide to gene views for in-depth exploration. The tool includes variation from P. knowlesi (n = 139), P. malariae (n = 158), P. ovale curtisi (n = 36), P. ovale wallikeri (n = 47), P. simium (n = 38), and P. vivax (n = 1359). It enables the investigation of population structure, geographic associations of mutations, and putative drug resistance markers, offering valuable insights for malaria control efforts. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Malaria-GENOMAP is available online at https://genomics.lshtm.ac.uk/malaria-genomaps.

Internet↗

Performance of Web-based image distribution: server-oriented measurements.

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of Web-based image distribution when multiple personal computers (PCs) are downloading images simultaneously for different server hardware configurations. Using specially developed software, the time-to-display (TTD) of different image types was measured with up to 16 concurrent PCs for various combinations of processor, random access memory (RAM), network connection and image compression. The TTD increased linearly with the number of concurrent PCs but remained under 5 s in most of the cases, even with 16 concurrent PCs. Only with a 10-Mbit/s network connection or with lossy compression were TTDs above 5 s obtained. Two processors instead of one led to a slight and constant improvement of the TTD. Reducing the amount of RAM increased the TTD mainly for computed radiography (CR) images. There was no difference between a 200- and 100-Mbit/s network, but 10 Mbit/s proved significantly worse. When increasing the number of clients lossless compression performed substantially better than lossy. A standard off-the-shelf server provides an appropriate download performance even with 16 concurrent clients. Processor speed and RAM amount are of minor importance, but it is highly recommended to use a 100-Mbit/s network connection and to avoid the application of on-demand lossy compression in a local area network.

Internet↗