PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10988182

Bronchoscopy training: current fellows' experiences and some concerns for the future.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine current pulmonary fellows' perspectives about their bronchoscopy training. DESIGN: Survey of 59 pulmonary fellows selected by training program directors to represent their institutions. SETTING: "Hands-on" symposium at the CHEST 1998 annual meeting, Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: Fellows reported a mean (+/- SD) of 2.4+/- 0.7 years of training, estimated they had performed 77.7+/-34 bronchoscopies per year, and had generally high estimates of their bronchoscopy proficiency and training. Proficiency estimates correlated with number of procedures cited (r = 0.43, p = 0.001) or level of fellowship training (r = 0.40, p = 0.002). Proficiency ratings (r = 0.63, p = 0.0001) and procedure numbers (r = 0.45, p-0. 0004) correlated with program quality ratings. Approaches to bronchoscopy instruction varied, and most often consisted of one-to-one instruction by faculty (92.5%), lecture-based instruction (74.6%), and case discussions (72.9%). Use of bronchoscopy lectures (p = 0.008) or videos (p = 0.057) were associated with higher self-estimates of proficiency, whereas use of lectures (p = 0.002), a bronchoscopy text (p = 0.009), and one-on-one instruction (p = 0.05) were associated with more highly ranked programs. Major components of training varied among programs. Although most fellows had received instruction encompassed in basic bronchoscopy, fewer had experience with bronchoscopic intubation (71.2%), transbronchial needle aspiration (72.9%), quantitative bacterial culture (64.4%), stent placement (27.1%), laser photocoagulation (25.4%), or cryotherapy (6.8%). Components of bronchoscopy experiences correlated with fellows' estimates of bronchoscopy proficiency and program quality. CONCLUSIONS: Approaches to bronchoscopy instruction and the components of bronchoscopy experiences vary considerably among institutions and are associated with pulmonary fellows' perceptions of bronchoscopy proficiency and training program quality. Definition of an optimum bronchoscopy curriculum remains necessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E F Haponik, G B Russell, J F Beamis, E J Britt, P Kvale, P Mathur, A Mehta. 2000. Bronchoscopy training: current fellows' experiences and some concerns for the future.. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.118.3.625

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Respiratory management of inhalation injury.

Advances in the care of patients with major burns have led to a reduction in mortality and a change in the cause of their death. Burn shock, which accounted for almost 20 percent of burn deaths in the 1930s and 1940s, is now treated with early, vigorous fluid resuscitation and is only rarely a cause of death. Burn wound sepsis, which emerged as the primary cause of mortality once burn shock decreased in importance, has been brought under control with the use of topical antibiotics and aggressive surgical debridement. Inhalation injury has now become the most frequent cause of death in burn patients. Although mortality from smoke inhalation alone is low (0-11 percent), smoke inhalation in combination with cutaneous burns is fatal in 30 to 90 percent of patients. It has been recently reported that the presence of inhalation injury increases burn mortality by 20 percent and that inhalation injury predisposes to pneumonia. Pneumonia has been shown to independently increase burn mortality by 40 percent, and the combination of inhalation injury and pneumonia leads to a 60 percent increase in deaths. Children and the elderly are especially prone to pneumonia due to a limited physiologic reserve. It is imperative that a well organized, protocol driven approach to respiratory care of inhalation injury be utilized so that improvements can be made and the morbidity and mortality associated with inhalation injury be reduced.

Bronchoscopy↗

State of the art: interventional pulmonology.

Interventional pulmonology (IP) provides comprehensive care to patients with structural airway disorders and pleural diseases. A growing armamentarium of diagnostic and therapeutic tools has expanded the interventional pulmonologist's ability to care for pulmonary patients with complex abnormalities, often in concert and close collaboration with physicians in other specialties, such as thoracic surgery. Innovative technologies promise to have an impact on diseases and clinical entities not traditionally treated by invasive pulmonary interventions, such as asthma, COPD, and the solitary pulmonary nodule. Training, credentialing, reimbursement, and scientific validation remain key necessities for the continued growth of IP, and require a concerted effort by chest physicians and their professional organizations.

Bronchoscopy↗