Object recognition: seeing us seeing shapes.

J A Mazer; J L Gallant

doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00684-9

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10996807

Object recognition: seeing us seeing shapes.

J A Mazer·J L Gallant

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Our understanding of the neural basis of object recognition is based primarily on work with non-human primates. The problem has recently been addressed in humans using functional magnetic resonance imaging; new results indicate that the lateral occipital complex plays an important role in human object recognition.

Explore related subjects

Cues Form Perception Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Occipital Lobe Pattern Recognition, Visual Visual Cortex Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J A Mazer, J L Gallant. 2000-09-21. Object recognition: seeing us seeing shapes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00684-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking.

Eye movements of listeners were monitored to investigate how gender information and accessibility influence the initial processes of pronoun interpretation. Previous studies on this issue have produced mixed results, and several studies have concluded that gender cues are not automatically used during the early processes of pronoun interpretation (e.g. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 73 (4), 231-255; Greene, S. B., McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 182, 266-283). In the two experiments presented here, participants viewed a picture with two familiar cartoon characters of either same or different gender. They listened to a text describing the picture, in which a pronoun referred to either the first, more accessible, character, or the second. (For example, Donald is bringing some mail to ¿Mickey/Minnie¿ while a violent storm is beginning. He's carrying an umbrellaellipsis.) The results of both experiments show rapid use of both gender and accessibility at approximately 200 ms after the pronoun offset.

Cues↗

PubMed2000

Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance.

We investigated the changes of human posture control of upright stance which occur when vestibular cues (VEST) are absent and visual and somatosensory orientation cues (VIS, SOM) are removed. Postural responses to sinusoidal tilts of a motion platform in the sagittal plane (+/-2 degrees, f=0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 Hz) were studied in normal subjects (Ns) and patients with bilateral vestibular loss (Ps). We found that absence of VEST (Ps, visual reference) and removal of VIS (Ns, no visual reference) had little effect on stabilization of upright body posture in space. In the absence of both VEST and VIS (Ps, no visual reference) somatosensory graviception still provided some information on body orientation in space at 0.05 and 0.1 Hz. However, at the higher frequencies Ps qualitatively changed their behavior; they then tended to actively align their bodies with respect to the motion platform. The findings confirm predictions of a novel postural control model.

Cues↗

PubMed2000

Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues.

Intuitively, one can assume that imitating a movement is an easier task than responding to a symbolic stimulus like a verbal instruction. Support for this suggestion can be found in neuropsychological research as well as in research on stimulus-response compatibility. However controlled experimental evidence for this assumption is still lacking. We used a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm to test the assumption. In a series of experiments, it was tested whether observed finger movements have a stronger influence on finger movement execution than a symbolic or spatial cue. In the first experiment, we compared symbolic cues with observed finger movements using an interference paradigm. Observing finger movements strongly influenced movement execution, irrespective of whether the finger movement was the relevant or the irrelevant stimulus dimension. In the second experiment, effects of observed finger movements and spatial finger cues were compared. The observed finger movement dominated the spatial finger cue. A reduction in the similarity of observed and executed action in the third experiment led to a decrease of the influence of observed finger movement, which demonstrates the crucial role of the imitative relation of observed and executed action for the described effects. The results are discussed in relation to recent models of stimulus-response compatibility. Neurocognitive support for the strong relationship between movement observation and movement execution is reported.

Cues↗