PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11006809

The evaluation of sensory processing: a validity study using contrasting groups.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of a sensory history questionnaire using contrasting groups. Specifically, the goal was to identify items on the Evaluation of Sensory Processing that differentiate between parent ratings of children with sensory integrative dysfunction and parent ratings of typically developing children. Data were collected from 30 parents of children with sensory integrative dysfunction and 59 parents of typically developing children. Items were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test to detect the difference between the parent ratings for the 30 children with sensory integrative dysfunction and 30 of the typically developing children who were matched to the dysfunctional children on age, ethnicity, gender, geographic location, and socioeconomic status. Eighty-four of the 200 items significantly (p < .05) distinguished between parents' ratings of children with and without sensory integrative dysfunction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C L Johnson-Ecker, L D Parham. The evaluation of sensory processing: a validity study using contrasting groups.. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.54.5.494

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Commentary: Trade-offs in the development of a sample design for case-control studies.

The recent article, "Comparison of Telephone Sampling and Area Sampling: Response Rates and Within-Household Coverage" (Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:1119-27), raised a number of issues related to two sampling methodologies that can be used for selecting population-based controls for case-control studies: random digit dialing (RDD) and area probability sampling. Some of these issues are discussed in this commentary in more detail to help in making sample design decisions, including the need to take the analysis plan into account when developing a sample design. Data from the paper are used to illustrate how the choice of sample design can affect analyses. Relative costs associated with the two methodologies as well as variance and bias concerns are also discussed in detail. Sample coverage issues, including those associated with list-assisted RDD, are considered, as are some advantages of the list-assisted approach. A discussion of the use of concurrent screening and sampling with an RDD approach as an alternative to periodically selecting fixed sample sizes is provided.

Case-Control Studies↗

Associations between hOGG1 sequence variants and prostate cancer susceptibility.

8-Hydroxyguanine is a mutagenic base lesion produced by reactive oxygen species. The hOGG1 gene encodes a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase that can suppress the mutagenic effects of 8-hydroxyguanine by catalyzing its removal from oxidized DNA. A population-based (245 cases and 222 controls) and family-based (159 hereditary prostate cancer families) association study was performed to test the hypothesis that sequence variants of hOGG1 increase susceptibility to prostate cancer. We found that the genotype frequency of two sequence variants (11657A/G and Ser326Cys) was significantly different between cases and controls. The association with 11657A/G is confirmed and strengthened by our family-based association study. These results suggest that sequence variants in this gene are associated with prostate cancer risk, presumably through defective DNA repair function of hOGG1.

Case-Control Studies↗