Statistical assessment of between batch stability equivalence.

M Llabrés; A Oliva; J Fariña

doi:10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00469-5

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11011987

Statistical assessment of between batch stability equivalence.

M Llabrés·A Oliva·J Fariña

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A statistical method for testing the equivalence between batches regarding their stability is proposed. This method is based on the statistical linear model making use of a set of dummy variables to code the different batches. The method gives us the point estimates of the slope and zero intercept of one batch, and the differences and the corresponding confidence intervals with the remaining batches. In a second step, zero intercepts and slopes are estimated for all the batches. Stability equivalence assessment is based on the comparison of the confidence intervals for the differences between batches with the maximum difference allowable. The main advantages of this method are the possibility to compare several batches, to disclose the equivalence stability criteria from the statistical hypothesis about the equality between slopes, and the joint estimated of the residual variance whatever the decision to pool or not the data from different batches. This method is illustrated with two data set; the first one, previously published by other authors, involved six batches; the second data set include two batches and arose in a stability study of a commercial human insulin conducted in our laboratory.

Explore related subjects

Confidence Intervals Drug Stability Humans Hypoglycemic Agents Insulin Linear Models Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M Llabrés, A Oliva, J Fariña. 2000-08-25. Statistical assessment of between batch stability equivalence.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00469-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Covariates-dependent confidence intervals for the difference or ratio of two median survival times.

In this paper, we are concerned with the estimation of the discrepancy between two treatments when right-censored survival data are accompanied with covariates. Conditional confidence intervals given the available covariates are constructed for the difference between or ratio of two median survival times under the unstratified and stratified Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. The proposed confidence intervals provide the information about the difference in survivorship for patients with common covariates but in different treatments. The results of a simulation study investigation of the coverage probability and expected length of the confidence intervals suggest the one designed for the stratified Cox model when data fit reasonably with the model. When the stratified Cox model is not feasible, however, the one designed for the unstratified Cox model is recommended. The use of the confidence intervals is finally illustrated with a HIV+ data set.

Confidence Intervals↗

PubMed2007

Inferences on standardized mean difference: the generalized variable approach.

The standardized mean difference has been widely used as the most common index of effect magnitude in many applied fields. In this paper, we propose a novel approach using the concept of generalized variable for the confidence interval estimation and hypothesis testing of standardized mean difference. Furthermore, we extend this approach to compare standardized mean differences between two studies or between two strata. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach can provide confidence intervals with excellent coverage properties and can perform hypothesis testing with satisfactory type-I error control.

Confidence Intervals↗

PubMed2007

Interval estimation for rank correlation coefficients based on the probit transformation with extension to measurement error correction of correlated ranked data.

The Spearman (rho(s)) and Kendall (tau) rank correlation coefficient are routinely used as measures of association between non-normally distributed random variables. However, confidence limits for rho(s) are only available under the assumption of bivariate normality and for tau under the assumption of asymptotic normality of tau. In this paper, we introduce another approach for obtaining confidence limits for rho(s) or tau based on the arcsin transformation of sample probit score correlations. This approach is shown to be applicable for an arbitrary bivariate distribution. The arcsin-based estimators for rho(s) and tau (denoted by rho(s,a), tau(a)) are shown to have asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of 9/pi2 compared with the usual estimators rho(s) and tau when rho(s) and tau are, respectively, 0. In some nutritional applications, the Spearman rank correlation between nutrient intake as assessed by a reference instrument versus nutrient intake as assessed by a surrogate instrument is used as a measure of validity of the surrogate instrument. However, if only a single replicate (or a few replicates) are available for the reference instrument, then the estimated Spearman rank correlation will be downwardly biased due to measurement error. In this paper, we use the probit transformation as a tool for specifying an ANOVA-type model for replicate ranked data resulting in a point and interval estimate of a measurement error corrected rank correlation. This extends previous work by Rosner and Willett for obtaining point and interval estimates of measurement error corrected Pearson correlations.

Confidence Intervals↗