PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11012410

A stakeholder analysis.

Abstract

This paper provides guidance on how to do a stakeholder analysis, whether the aim is to conduct a policy analysis, predict policy development, implement a specific policy or project, or obtain an organizational advantage in one's dealings with other stakeholders. Using lessons learned from an analysis of alcohol policy development in Hungary, it outlines issues to be considered before undertaking the stakeholder analysis concerning the purpose and time dimensions of interest, the time-frame and the context in which the analysis will be conducted. It outlines advantages and disadvantages of an individual or team approach, and of the use of insiders and outsiders for the analysis. It describes how to identify and approach stakeholders and considers the use of qualitative or quantitative data collection methods for estimating stakeholder positions, levels of interest and influence around an issue. A key message is that the process of data collection and analysis needs to be iterative; the analyst needs to revise and deepen earlier levels of the analysis, as new data are obtained. Different examples of ways of analyzing, presenting and illustrating the information are provided. Stakeholder analysis is a useful tool for managing stakeholders and identifying opportunities to mobilize their support for a particular goal. However, various biases and uncertainties necessitate a cautious approach in using it and applying its results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Z Varvasovszky, R Brugha. 2000. A stakeholder analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol%2F15.3.338

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) responds to requests by the Department of Health for guidance on the use of selected new and established technologies in the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales. This paper asks whether the NICE methodological guidelines help NHS decision makers meet the objectives of maximum health improvements from NHS resources and an equitable availability of technologies. The analytical basis of the guidelines is a comparison of the costs and consequences of new and existing methods of dealing with particular conditions using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We explain why information on the costs and consequences of a particular technology in isolation is insufficient to address issues of efficiency of resource use. We argue that to increase efficiency, decision makers need information on opportunity costs. We show that in the absence of such information decision makers cannot identify the efficient use of resources. Finally we argue that economics provides valid methods for identifying the maximisation of health improvements for a given allocation of resources and we describe an alternative practical approach to this problem. Drawing on the experience of Ontario, Canada where an approach similar to that proposed by NICE has been in use for almost a decade, and recent reports about the consequences of NICE decisions to date, we conclude that instead of increasing the efficiency or equity of the use of NHS resources, NICE methodological guidelines may lead to: uncontrolled increases in NHS expenditures without evidence of any increase in total health improvements; increased inequities in the availability of services; and concerns about the sustainability of public funding for new technologies.

Decision Making, Organizational↗

Do you know who will be vaccinated at your ED?

The administration of the smallpox vaccine is imminent, so emergency department managers are making difficult decisions about which individuals should be vaccinated. If all attending physicians are vaccinated, these individuals can care for patients with suspected smallpox. Consider offering vaccine first to staff who have been immunized previously. Survey staff to find out which individuals have contraindications for the vaccine.

Decision Making, Organizational↗