PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11019877

Slit skiascopic-guided ablation using the Nidek laser.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the approach of using a scanning slit refractometer (the ARK 10000) in conjunction with a corneal topography system to guide customized corneal ablation. This diagnostic system is coupled with the Nidek EC-5000 system which combines scanning slit and a scanning small area ablation (1.0 mm) to perform a customized ablation. METHODS: The ARK 10000 diagnostic system which contains a scanning slit refractometer is described. Information generated from the ARK 10000 wavefront sensor and corneal topography system can be coupled to the new Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser system, which combines the larger area of scanning slit ablation with the small area (1.0 mm) ablation. RESULTS: The Nidek ARK 10000 diagnostic system captures wavefront information using a retinoscopic system which is converted into a refractive power map. This is different from other autorefraction systems in that it has four sensors at different diameters of the cornea and captures 1440 points in 0.4 seconds. This map is used in conjunction with corneal topography-captured simultaneously. This information is then combined to perform a customized ablation using the new Nidek EC-5000 system. CONCLUSIONS: The ARK 10000 diagnostic system represents a different approach to customized ablation in that it combines a corneal topography system with a wavefront system and a larger treatment area of the traditional scanning slit ablation with a new small area ablation treatment for greater efficiency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S MacRae, M Fujieda. Slit skiascopic-guided ablation using the Nidek laser.. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597x-20000901-18

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Conceptual model of human blur perception.

An empirically based, conceptual model of human blur perception is presented. It incorporates the concepts of blur detection and blur discrimination in depth, and across the central and peripheral retina, in two- and three-dimensional visual space. Key aspects of the model are its dynamic nature, predictability regarding the blur-based depth-ordering of objects, patterns of retinal defocus with far and near viewing, and interactions related to retinal defocus between the central and peripheral retina. Furthermore, a two-dimensional schematic representation of the blur-free region during near viewing is depicted in dioptric space. This model has implications with respect to accommodative control, depth perception, and refractive error development and progression.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

The effect of human in vivo accommodation on crystalline lens stability.

AIM: To determine the effect of human in vivo accommodation on the stability of the crystalline lens. METHODS: Using a dual Purkinje image (DPI) eyetracker, the phase-time difference and amplitudes of Purkinje images I (P(I)) and IV (P(1V)) were measured in 37 normal emmetropic subjects (34 women and 3 men; mean age 19.8, range 18-22 years) when they changed focus from 70 to 15 cm and simultaneously rotated their heads horizontally from side to side or made horizontal saccades between two targets 6.8 degrees apart. RESULTS: When the subjects changed focus from 70 to 15 cm and rotated their heads or made eye saccades, the phase-time difference between P(I) and P(IV) decreased. During saccades, the amplitude of both P(I) and P(IV) overshoots significantly increased with focus at 15 cm; however, their ratio (P(IV) overshoot amplitude/P(I) overshoot amplitude) significantly declined. CONCLUSIONS: The lens is stable during accommodation. The implications of these findings on the mechanism of accommodation are discussed.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of an accommodating dual-optic intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Private practice and university centers. METHODS: A prospective noncomparative case series with retrospective control comprised 21 patients (26 eyes) scheduled for small-incision extracapsular cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with implantation of the Synchrony dual-optic accommodating IOL (Visiogen) (accommodating IOL group) and 10 patients who had small-incision extracapsular phacoemulsification with implantation of a monofocal, single-optic IOL at least 6 months previously (control group). Patients were examined 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Defocus curves in the accommodating IOL group were compared with those in the control group. The main outcome measures were postoperative distance uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity; near uncorrected, distance corrected, and near corrected visual acuity; and accommodative range based on defocus curves. RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes were available at the 6-month follow-up visit. All eyes had best corrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 19 eyes (79%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Uncorrected near visual acuity was 20/40 or better in all eyes. With distance correction, 23 eyes (96%) had an acuity of 20/40 or better at near. Defocus curve analysis suggested a mean accommodative range of 3.22 diopters (D) +/- 0.88 (SD) (range 1.00 to 5.00 D) in the accommodating IOL group and 1.65 +/- 0.58 D in the control group (range 1.00 to 2.50 D) (P<.05). CONCLUSION: The Synchrony dual-optic IOL shows promise as an option to provide accommodative function in pseudophakic patients.

Accommodation, Ocular↗