PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11022883

Team mental models: techniques, methods, and analytic approaches.

Abstract

Effective team functioning requires the existence of a shared or team mental model among members of a team. However, the best method for measuring team mental models is unclear. Methods reported vary in terms of how mental model content is elicited and analyzed or represented. We review the strengths and weaknesses of vatrious methods that have been used to elicit, represent, and analyze individual and team mental models and provide recommendations for method selection and development. We describe the nature of mental models and review techniques that have been used to elicit and represent them. We focus on a case study on selecting a method to examine team mental models in industry. The processes involved in the selection and development of an appropriate method for eliciting, representing, and analyzing team mental models are described. The criteria for method selection were (a) applicability to the problem under investigation; (b) practical considerations - suitability for collecting data from the targeted research sample; and (c) theoretical rationale - the assumption that associative networks in memory are a basis for the development of mental models. We provide an evaluation of the method matched to the research problem and make recommendations for future research. The practical applications of this research include the provision of a technique for analyzing team mental models in organizations, the development of methods and processes for eliciting a mental model from research participants in their normal work environment, and a survey of available methodologies for mental model research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Langan-Fox, S Code, K Langfield-Smith. 2000. Team mental models: techniques, methods, and analytic approaches.. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872000779656534

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Community dynamics in a university environment.

Scholars have characterized academic communities of faculty, administration, and students in U.S. universities as "organized anarchies." In contrast, we offer evidence that the community structures of two representative public university systems are notably systematic by applying empirical phase-diagram techniques from the nonlinear dynamics literature to reconstruct low-dimensional deterministic behavior from historic data on the coevolution of faculty, administration, and student populations in each system. Ecological community models, fit with population data for each university, reproduce the essence of this behavior. The models offer novel explanations of how university resources obtained from enrollments and other sources are systematically partitioned among faculty, administration, and student populations interacting in shifting and well-defined community roles. This work offers empirical evidence that ecological principles, typically reserved for characterizing nonhuman interactions in biological systems, can shed light on human interactions in social systems.

Group Processes↗

A neural network simulation of the outgroup homogeneity effect.

This article presents a neural network simulation of the out-group homogeneity effect (OHE). The model is a feedback network with delta-rule learning that has been previously used to simulate other aspects of stereotype learning, as well as causal learning and reasoning, and human memory. This simulation achieves 2 goals: First, we show that the model could successfully simulate the OHE. We argue that this is due to the error-correcting nature of delta-rule learning. Second, we show that each of 5 aspects of the simulation influences the size of the OHE: (a) the ratio of in-group to out-group size, (b) the overall population size, (c) the learning rate, (d) the decay rate for weights, and (e) increased learning for extreme cases. The psychological relevance of these parameters and ways to study them are presented. Advantages of the model in terms of breadth of coverage for studying social cognitive phenomena are discussed.

Group Processes↗