PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11031559

Learning driver-response relationships from synchronization patterns.

Abstract

We test recent claims that causal (driver-response) relationships can be deduced from interdependencies between simultaneously measured time series. We apply two recently proposed interdependence measures that should give results similar to cross predictabilities used by previous authors. The systems that we study are asymmetrically coupled simple models (Lorenz, Roessler, and Hénon models), the couplings being such that they lead to generalized synchronization. If the data were perfect (noise-free, infinitely long), we should be able to detect, at least in some cases, which of the coupled systems is the driver and which the response. This might no longer be true if the time series has finite length. Instead, estimated interdependencies depend strongly on which of the systems has a higher effective dimension at the typical neighborhood sizes used to estimate them, and causal relationships are more difficult to detect. We also show that slightly different variants of the interdependence measure can have quite different sensitivities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Q Quiroga, J Arnhold, P Grassberger. 2000. Learning driver-response relationships from synchronization patterns.. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.61.5142

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The distinction between eye and object motion is reflected by the motion-onset visual evoked potential.

Humans are able to distinguish eye movement-induced retinal image motion and physical object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements. We investigated the neurophysiological basis of this ability by comparing motion-onset visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to onset of: (1) physical object motion during fixation, (2) eye movement-induced retinal image motion, and (3) physical object motion during eye movements. Electro-oculographic (EOG) artifacts were removed and the influence of eye-movement quality was evaluated. Retinal image shift was of similar magnitude in all conditions (9 degrees /s) and elicited typical motion-onset VEPs, with N2 at occipital and P2 at central derivations. During smooth pursuit, physical object motion induced N2 and P2 of higher latencies than during fixation. In the absence of physical object motion, i.e., for exclusively eye movement-induced retinal image motion, the N2 amplitude was reduced. This is taken as evidence that the activity of detectors of physical object motion is reflected by a part of the N2 component. N2 also reflects eye movement-induced retinal image motion. It is concluded that headcentric motion detection and the detection of eye movement-induced retinal image motion is mediated by brain mechanisms with similar latencies and, within the resolution limits of VEPs, at similar locations.

Electroencephalography↗

Correlation-dimension and autocorrelation fluctuations in epileptic seizure dynamics.

We focus on an anomalous scaling region in correlation integral [C(epsilon)] analysis of electrocorticogram in epilepsy patients. We find that epileptic seizures typically are accompanied by wide fluctuations in the slope of this scaling region. An explanation, based on analyzing the interplay between the autocorrelation and C(epsilon), is provided for these fluctuations. This anomalous slope appears to be a sensitive measure for tracking (but not predicting) seizures.

Electroencephalography↗