PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11031696

HELLP syndrome.

Abstract

HELLP syndrome is a serious, life-threatening form of pre-eclampsia with a typical laboratory triad. The incidence of the disease is reported as being 0.17-0.85% of all live births. There has been, to date, neither reliable early recognition nor effective prevention of HELLP syndrome. As a result of endothelial dysfunction, activation of intravascular coagulation occurs with fibrin deposition in the capillaries and consecutive microcirculation disorders. The disease manifests itself on average between 32-34 weeks' gestation. HELLP syndrome will occur postpartum in up to 30% of the cases. The clinical cardinal symptom of the disease is right upper quadrant pain or epigastric pain accompanied with nausea, vomiting and malaise. In 20% of the cases with HELLP syndrome there is no hypertension and 5-15% of the pregnant patients present a low level of proteinuria or none at all. The early recognition of hemolysis is most sensitively managed by the determination of the serum haptoglobin. The increase of the aspartate transaminase (AST) and the alanine transaminase (ALT) often precedes a decrease in platelets. The course of HELLP syndrome is incalculable. It is universally agreed that a pregnancy from 32-34 weeks should be immediately delivered. Before 32-34 weeks, expectant management is generally possible in a perinatal center. The frequency for a repeated hypertensive disease in pregnancy ranges from 27% to 48%.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Rath, A Faridi, J W Dudenhausen. 2000. HELLP syndrome.. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2000.033

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Utility of a rapid B-natriuretic peptide assay in differentiating congestive heart failure from lung disease in patients presenting with dyspnea.

OBJECTIVES: Since B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is secreted by the left ventricle (LV) in response to volume elevated LV pressure, we sought to assess whether a rapid assay for BNP levels could differentiate cardiac from pulmonary causes of dyspnea. BACKGROUND: Differentiating congestive heart failure (CHF) from pulmonary causes of dyspnea is very important for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute dyspnea. METHODS: B-natriuretic peptide levels were obtained in 321 patients presenting to the ED with acute dyspnea. Physicians were blinded to BNP levels and asked to give their probability of the patient having CHF and their final diagnosis. Two independent cardiologists were blinded to BNP levels and asked to review the data and evaluate which patients presented with heart failure. Patients with right heart failure from cor pulmonale were classified as having CHF. RESULTS: Patients with CHF (n = 134) had BNP levels of 758.5 +/- 798 pg/ml, significantly higher than the group of patients with a final diagnosis of pulmonary disease (n = 85) whose BNP was 61 +/- 10 pg/ml. The area under the receiver operating curve, which plots sensitivity versus specificity for BNP levels in separating cardiac from pulmonary disease, was 0.96 (p < 0.001). A breakdown of patients with pulmonary disease revealed: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): 54 +/- 71 pg/ml (n = 42); asthma: 27 +/- 40 pg/ml (n = 11); acute bronchitis: 44 +/- 112 pg/ml (n = 14); pneumonia: 55 +/- 76 pg/ml (n = 8); tuberculosis: 93 +/- 54 pg/ml (n = 2); lung cancer: 120 +/- 120 pg/ml (n = 4); and acute pulmonary embolism: 207 +/- 272 pg/ml (n = 3). In patients with a history of lung disease but whose current complaint of dyspnea was seen as due to CHF, BNP levels were 731 +/- 764 pg/ml (n = 54). The group with a history of CHF but with a current COPD diagnosis had a BNP of 47 +/- 23 pg/ml (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid testing of BNP in the ED should help differentiate pulmonary from cardiac etiologies of dyspnea.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

Leiomyosarcoma of the lumbar spine: case report.

STUDY DESIGN: A primary leiomyosarcoma in the L2 vertebral body without any neurologic deficit is reported. The radiologic diagnosis was a metastasis, and the histologic diagnosis was confirmed by transpedicular needle biopsy. OBJECTIVE: To emphasize the occurrence of primary leiomyosarcoma in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Leiomyosarcoma is a rare malignant neoplasm of the bone, and only one report of the primary spinal tumor exists. In the case of leiomyosarcoma of the bone, metastasis, most commonly of the uterus or gastrointestinal tract, must be carefully ruled out before the diagnosis of primary leiomyosarcoma in the bone is confirmed. METHODS: Leiomyosarcoma of the second lumbar vertebra in a 47-year-old woman with no neurologic deficit is reported. Imaging findings indicated a nonspecific high-grade lesion. A total spondylectomy of L2 with en bloc excision of the lower half of L1 and the upper third of L3 vertebral bodies was performed after preoperative radiation therapy. The defect of the vertebral body was reconstructed by titanium mesh cage, and T11 to S1 vertebrae were instrumented by the pedicle screw and rod system. RESULTS: The surgical margin was marginal. Histologically, the tumor cells were elongated, with abundant cytoplasm and cigar-shaped nuclei, showing proliferation in fascicles and bundles. No sign of local recurrence or metastasis was evident 2 years and 1 month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Leiomyosarcoma should be included in the differential diagnosis of spindle cell tumor of the spine, and it should be confirmed or excluded by immunohistochemical and/or ultrastructural studies. If the expected surgical margin is definitive, a total en bloc spondylectomy should be performed.

Diagnosis, Differential↗