PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11037215

Neutralizing differences: producing neutral doctors for (almost) neutral patients.

Abstract

Today 50% of medical students in Canada are women; they come from a wide range of racial, cultural, academic, and class backgrounds; they may openly identify as gay or lesbian. Yet to the extent that professional socialization produces uniformity of values, attitudes and future practice styles, the impact of increasing diversity is lessened. Based on a survey with undergraduate medical students, interviews with 25 students, and interviews with 23 faculty members and administrators at one Canadian medical school, this paper argues that there are impetuses within believe that the social class, 'race', ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation of a physician is not--and should not be--relevant during physician patient interactions. In short, intentional and unintentional homogenizing influences in their training work to neutralize the impact of increasing social differences among medical students.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B L Beagan. 2000. Neutralizing differences: producing neutral doctors for (almost) neutral patients.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00043-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Toward a culture-bound syndrome-based insanity defense?

The American Psychiatric Association's recent inclusion of a Glossary of Culture-Bound Syndromes within DSM-IV draws upon decades of medical anthropological and cultural psychiatric research to afford culture-bound syndromes (CBSs) a newfound legitimacy within professional Western psychiatric nosology. While DSM-IV's recognition of the CBS concept as a category of psychosocial distress has important clinical implications for mental health care practitioners throughout the world, it also has significant legal implications. Given that several CBSs involve a degree of psychological impairment that may satisfy the standard for legal insanity under certain circumstances, this essay focuses on the potential emergence of an insanity defense based on the claim that an immigrant or minority defendant was suffering from a CBS at the time of his or her criminal act. Aimed at initiating interdisciplinary debate over the reification of the CBS concept, the essay discusses the theoretical ambiguity and status of CBSs within professional Western psychiatry, describes what a CBS-based insanity defense might look like, and considers the relevant challenges facing medical anthropologists and cultural psychiatrists, on the one hand, and legal practitioners, on the other. The essay identifies a pressing need for interdisciplinary debate concerning the validity, scope, and viability of CBS-based insanity defenses.

Cultural Characteristics↗