PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11042781

Implementing evidence-based practice in infection control.

D Ward
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Evidence-based practice is seen as a way of providing more effective health care and is considered to be vital in the current healthcare climate. However, in many areas of practice, and specifically in infection control, there is often little or no evidence to back or refute certain practices. This article looks at ritualistic practices, interventions with indirect evidence to support them and practices with overwhelming evidence in their favour which are not always followed. It is concluded that nurses need to integrate the best available evidence with clinical judgment and ensure that available evidence is disseminated appropriately.

Explore related subjects

Cross InfectionDiffusion of InnovationEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfection ControlNursing Staff, HospitalResearchJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Ward. Implementing evidence-based practice in infection control.. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2000.9.5.6360

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Large variation in MRSA policies, procedures and prevalence in English intensive care units: a questionnaire analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major problem in intensive care units in most countries. Despite recommendations for screening and isolation of patients with MRSA our perception has been that there is little uniformity in approach in ICUs besides adherence to basic infection control procedures. We thus sought to identify MRSA prevalence and the variation of infection control policy across intensive care units in England. DESIGN AND SETTING: Postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up in English intensive care units. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 217 (96%) ICUs. Marked variation in practice was noted in terms of patient screening, staff screening, infection control procedures, isolation or cohorting of colonised/infected patients, and ward discharge policy. Point prevalence data showed that 16.2% of ICU patients were known to be colonised or infected with MRSA. There was a regional bias, but no difference was noted between high and low prevalence regions in terms of unit demographics or infection control policies. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the lack of consistent policy across English ICUs regarding isolation, screening and discharge practices for MRSA. Prospective studies are urgently needed to determine best practice.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2003

Molecular epidemiology and forensic genetics: application to a hepatitis C virus transmission event at a hemodialysis unit.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses are frequently used in epidemiologic testing, although only occasionally in forensics. Their acceptability is hampered by a lack of statistical confidence in the conclusions. However, maximum likelihood testing provides a sound statistical framework for the testing of phylogenetic hypotheses relevant for forensic analysis. We present the results of applying this method to a small hepatitis C outbreak produced in a hospital hemodialysis unit that involved 6 patients. Polymerase chain reaction products from a 472-nt fragment of the E1-E2 region, including the hypervariable region, HVR-1, of the hepatitis C virus genome were cloned, and an average of 10 clones/patient and from 11 additional control patients were sequenced. The method allows a statistical evaluation that the likelihood of each sample belonging or not to a given group, a question of relevance in many forensic and epidemiological analyses of molecular sequences.

Cross Infection↗