PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11057365

Using benchmarking data to evaluate and support pharmacy programs in health systems.

J E Murphy
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The use of benchmarking data to evaluate and support pharmacy programs in health systems is discussed. Benchmarking is a method of comparing the outcomes of health care products, services, and practices at an institution against those of competitors in order to learn what might be improved. Benchmarking programs can provide valuable feedback about both positive and negative outcomes. However, it is imperative to avoid inappropriate comparisons and inappropriate assessments. Ideal services for benchmarking are those that have a good likelihood of improving patient care and other outcomes. Successful benchmarking requires sound and thorough data, which is why as many health systems as possible should participate in a benchmarking program. The National Committee for Quality Assurance has formulated guidelines that should enable health systems to develop an information framework that will improve their ability to collect and use data for benchmarking. Standardization in collecting and submitting information is important because it enables institutions to share data easily. Benchmarking can help health-system pharmacists understand the value and outcomes of efforts by their colleagues at other institutions. In addition, benchmarking can help convince health-system administrators of the value of pharmaceutical services in terms of patient care and the bottom line. Benchmarking provides a means of evaluating and supporting the development of pharmacy programs that improve care and save money.

Explore related subjects

BenchmarkingHumansPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalQuality Assurance, Health CareJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Murphy. 2000-10-15. Using benchmarking data to evaluate and support pharmacy programs in health systems.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp%2F57.suppl_2.s28

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Beyond benchmarking: an expert-guided consensus approach to spatially aware clustering.

Spatial omics technologies have revolutionized the study of tissue architecture and cellular heterogeneity by integrating molecular profiles with spatial localization. In spatially resolved transcriptomics, delineating higher-order anatomical structures is critical for understanding how cellular organization affects function. However, the reliability of current benchmarks of spatially aware clustering (SAC) methods is undermined by their narrow focus on Visium and brain tissue datasets and the incorrect interpretation of manual annotation as ground truth. Here we present SACCELERATOR, a community-driven, extensible framework that standardizes data formatting, method integration and metric evaluation, enabling rapid inclusion of new methods and datasets. Our analysis revealed substantial limitations in the generalizability and reproducibility of SAC methods and shows that anatomical labels commonly used as ground truths are often biased, error prone and unsuitable for benchmarking. Rather than ranking methods, we propose a consensus-guided workflow where descriptive spatial metrics highlight high-entropy regions of method disagreement, enabling targeted feedback for tissue experts. Applied to brain and cancer datasets, this approach uncovered biologically meaningful patterns overlooked by individual SAC methods and manual annotations, highlighting the need for iterative, expert-in-the-loop evaluation.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed2026

Essence: A benchmarking-validated transformer framework for early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. The lack of objective molecular biomarkers limits early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Here, we propose Essence, a benchmarking-validated framework integrating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics with traditional and deep learning models to identify robust protein signatures for PD. Using data from two independent cohorts, 1266 high-confidence proteins are quantified, among which 178 exhibit differential abundance between PD and healthy controls (HC). Through systematic benchmarking of ten machine learning algorithms and four neural architectures, the Transformer model consistently outperforms alternatives across multiple feature selection strategies, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 1.0000 with only 35 features. Functional analyses of the top-ranked 35 proteins reveal enrichment in neuroinflammatory, synaptic, and oxidative stress-related pathways. Importantly, spatial transcriptomic profiling based on the Allen Brain Atlas shows region-specific expression of these biomarkers in PD-relevant brain structures, including the striatum, subthalamic nucleus, hippocampus, and white matter tracts. This anatomical alignment supports the functional relevance of the identified markers and highlights their potential utility in early-stage diagnosis and mechanistic understanding of PD.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed2025

Benchmarking with synthetic communities provides a baseline for virus-host inferences from Hi-C proximity linking.

Microbiomes influence diverse ecosystems, and viruses increasingly appear to impose key constraints. While viromics has expanded genomic catalogs, host identification for these viruses remains challenging due to the limitations in scaling cultivation-based approaches and the uncertain reliability and relative low resolution of in silico predictions - particularly for understudied viral taxa. Towards this, Hi-C proximity ligation uses sequenced, cross-linked virus and host genomic fragments to infer virus-host linkages and has now been applied in at least 10 studies. However, its accuracy remains unknown. Here we assess Hi-C performance in recovering virus-host interactions using synthetic communities (SynComs) composed of four marine bacterial strains and nine phages with known interactions and then apply optimized bioinformatic protocols to natural soil samples. In SynComs, standard Hi-C sample preparations and analyses showed poor normalized contact score performance (26% specificity, 100% sensitivity, incorrect matches up to class level) that could be dramatically improved by Z-score filtering (Z ≥ 0.5, 99% specificity), though at reduced sensitivity (62% down from 100%). Detection limits were established as reproducibility was poor below minimal phage abundances of 105 PFU/mL. Applying optimized bioinformatic protocols to natural soil samples, we compared virus-host linkages inferred from proximity-ligated Hi-C sequencing with predictions generated by in silico homology-based and machine learning-based bioinformatic approaches. Prior to Z-score thresholding, agreement was relatively high at the phylum to family levels (72%), but not at the genus (43%) or species (15%) levels. Z-score thresholding reduced sensitivity (only 34% of predictions were retained), with only modest improvements in congruence with bioinformatic methods (48% or 18% at genus or species levels, respectively). Regardless, this led to 79 genus-level-congruent virus-host linkages and 293 new ones revealed by Hi-C alone, i.e., providing many new virus-host interactions to explore in already well-studied climate-critical soils. Overall, these findings provide empirical benchmarks and methodological guidelines to improve the accuracy and reliability of Hi-C for virus-host linkage studies in complex microbial communities.

Benchmarking↗