PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11060700

Therapeutic developments in multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

Recently there have been considerable advances made in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. For the first time since its initial clinical description in the 1800s, there are now available several medications which unequivocally exert favourable clinical effects through the lowering of the biological activity of the human illness. The therapeutic efficacy of IFN-beta preparations seems particularly well established in this regard on the basis of five large, independent, trials of this agent. These trials have demonstrated remarkably consistent reductions in both attack rates and disability levels using a combination of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome measures. The therapeutic benefit of glatiramer acetate also has been well established, although there is less available data on this agent than there is for interferon. It is important to recognise, however, that, although these agents represent an important first step in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis, they are only partial therapies. In order to actually cure the illness or even to substantially improve patient outcome we need considerably better agents than we have currently. Nevertheless, it is likely that, with improved knowledge of the role that interferon beta plays in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and with better understanding of the mechanism by which glatiramer acetate exerts its therapeutic effect, greatly improved therapeutic agents will be available in the future. In addition, it seems likely that, in the future (by analogy to the experience in oncology), we will begin utilising combinations of therapies in order to better control the biological activity of this debilitating disease. Such combination therapy will almost certainly include combinations of partially effective agents as well as combinations of these agents with other medications (e.g., the immunosuppressive drugs) which, by themselves, have only been demonstrated to exert marginal clinical benefits on the course of illness. Moreover, it also seems likely that, increasingly, therapeutic strategies that enhance or promote myelin repair will become a major focus of clinical research in this area.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D S Goodin. 2000. Therapeutic developments in multiple sclerosis.. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.9.4.655

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.

Sample size calculations are given for comparing two groups of subjects, typically referring to active and non-active intervention groups, on an ordinal outcome in experiments where the subjects are measured before and after intervention. These calculations apply to log-odds models with random intercepts, treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction terms, the latter being the term of interest. The assumed forms of the odds ratios are flexible, allowing for proportional odds, adjacent categories, or other conditional models for ordinal responses. Simulations studies show that, for given sample sizes, the nominal and actual powers of the proposed test are similar.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A modified large-sample approach to approximate interval estimation for a particular intraclass correlation coefficient.

We consider the problem of constructing a confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficient in an interrater reliability study when both raters and subjects are random effects in a two-way random effects model. A simulation study is conducted to investigate and compare the interval coverage per cents of three methods of approximation: (i) Satterthwaite's two moments, the standard approach; (ii) modified three moments, a newer approach; and (iii) modified large sample, the newest approach for this particular problem. One-sided lower and two-sided bounds are examined. For the two-moment approach, coverage of confidence intervals can be understated for not only one-sided bounds but also two-sided bounds. Coverage of confidence intervals for the modified large-sample approach is either correct or conservative and provides narrower two-sided widths than the modified three-moment approach, which can understate coverage on one-sided and two-sided bounds for two or three raters. The competing methods are illustrated with data from a reliability study of four raters evaluating the number of decayed, missing, and filled surfaces in the permanent teeth of ten subjects. Overall, the modified large-sample approach provides the most satisfactory performance of the three methods.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Robustness of sample size re-estimation procedure in clinical trials (arbitrary populations).

In clinical trials, one of the main questions that is being asked is how many additional observations, if any, are needed beyond those originally planned. In a two-treatment double-blind clinical experiment, one is interested in testing the null hypothesis of equality of the means against one-sided alternative when the common variance sigma2 is unknown. We wish to determine the required total sample size when the error probabilities alpha and beta are specified at a predetermined alternative. Shih provided a two-stage procedure which is an extension of Stein's one-sample procedure, assuming normal response. He estimates sigma2 by the method of maximum likelihood via the EM algorithm and carries out a simulation study in order to evaluate the effective level of significance and the power. The author proposed a closed-form estimator for sigma2 and showed analytically that the difference between the effective and nominal levels of significance is negligible and that the power exceeds 1-beta when the initial sample size is large. Here we consider responses from arbitrary distributions in which the mean and the variance are not functionally related and show that when the initial sample size is large, the conclusions drawn previously by the author still hold. The effective coverage probability of a fixed-width interval is also evaluated. Proofs of certain assertions are deferred to the Appendix.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗