PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11064569

[Coronary revascularization on beating heart].

Abstract

At authors clinic 563 coronary artery bypass graft procedures were done from 1. January 1998 to 15. September 1999. 134 coronary revascularizations were performed from the same surgical team on beating heart using the same surgical technic at normothermia. Out of them, 98 operations were done with and 36 without ECC support respectively. Patients were operated on with this sophisticated technic exclusively during this period. Conversion to cardiac arrest was not necessary in any case. Male/female ratio was 76/58, 84% of the patients suffered from one or more preoperative myocardial infarction. The average bypass number was 2.7/patient. Arterial revascularization was performed in 94%. Postoperative mortality was 2.2% (3 pts). The postoperative inotropic demand, myocardial infarction rate (CK-MB release) and the amount of bleeding was very low. Mean postoperative stay in the ICU decreased to the average of 19 hrs. Patients normally left hospital on the 7th postoperative day. This operative technique--performed by an experienced surgeon--is less invasive for the heart and other organ systems, the incidence of complications can be decreased and the principle of complete revascularization is not compromised.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Sugár, E Nagy, A Somogyi, L Hajdu, I Tomcsányi. 2000-10-01. [Coronary revascularization on beating heart].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11064569/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Current trends in coronary artery disease in women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are some striking sex differences regarding presentation, symptoms and sign, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, healthcare delivery to women has been plagued with treatment bias favoring men. This review will present relevant cardiovascular physiologic sex differences, current treatment options for coronary artery disease both surgical and medical, and clinical outcomes of such treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past, pharmacologic and interventional studies generally excluded women from their subjects. As a result, women have been traditionally treated based on the findings in their male counterparts. Recent studies examining sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease have given new insight into the hormonal and behavioral influences associated with coronary artery disease. Finally, these studies have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Despite significant advances in medical and surgical approaches to treat coronary artery disease, it remains and will continue to be the most important healthcare challenge of the 21st century. Whereas efforts are underway to encourage inclusion of more women in therapeutic trials, the educational process, particularly in medical school, needs to broadly address sex specific pathophysiology and treatment, rather than relying on sub-subspecialty training for optimizing healthcare delivery in women.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗