PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11064909

[The causal relationship].

Abstract

Only the controlled trial method, clinical equivalent to the experimental method, with its successive phases and randomization, is able to confirm a real causal relationship and quantify the risk of error (alpha). However, the study must have sufficient power and randomization must not have resulted in an unbalanced distribution of various parameters likely to influence the result. Other methods, particularly surveys and case studies, only provide presumptions of causality. This review article, illustrated by three examples from the urological literature, is designed to demonstrate the difficulties of establishing a causal relationship when possible biases and confounding factors are taken into account.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Glemain. 2000. [The causal relationship].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11064909/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The causal relationship between multiple cardiovascular diseases and glioblastoma: A Mendelian randomization study.

Observational studies suggest an association between glioblastoma (GBM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), but a causal relationship remains unestablished. This study aimed to investigate the causal link between multiple CVDs and GBM risk. The inverse variance weighted method indicated that all 18 CVDs had significant causal associations with GBM (P&#x2005;<&#x2005;.05). Genetically predicted CVDs were uniformly associated with a lower risk of GBM (odds ratio&#x2005;<&#x2005;1), identifying them as potential protective factors. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the absence of significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, and the MR-Steiger test validated the correct causal direction. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study provides evidence that a range of CVDs are causally associated with a decreased risk of developing GBM. These findings suggest shared biological pathways and offer new insights for understanding GBM etiology. We conducted a 2-sample MR analysis using publicly available genome-wide association study data. GBM was the outcome, and 18 cardiovascular-related traits (including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and venous thromboembolism) were exposures. Instrumental variables were single-nucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with exposures (P&#x2005;<&#x2005;5&#x2005;&#xd7;&#x2005;10-8). The primary analysis used the inverse variance weighted method, supplemented with MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods. Sensitivity analyses, including Cochran Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, leave-one-out analysis, and MR-Steiger directionality test, were performed to ensure robustness.

Causality↗

A 2-year prospective longitudinal study on low back pain in primary school children.

There is increasing evidence that non-specific low back pain (LBP) is common among children and adolescents, but there are few longitudinal studies on this subject. This is a longitudinal prospective study aimed at finding factors associated with the prediction of low back pain in schoolchildren aged 9-12 years, which is a younger age group than has previously been studied. This study was performed on school children in the city of Antwerp, Belgium. A total of 287 children filled out a questionnaire and were examined at the beginning of the study (T1) and 2 years later (T2). The questionnaire asked about back pain, general health, health perceptions, quality of life perceptions, sports, leisure, daily life, school life (weight of satchel.) and some issues related to parents (smoking, LBP). The questionnaire reliability was tested. Logistic regression was used to analyse the data. No predictors for LBP in children could be identified. Using logistic regression techniques, we analysed the children who reported no lifetime episode of LBP at both T1 and T2, the children who did report a lifetime episode at both T1 and T2 and also those who reported a history of LBP at T2 only (New LBP). At T2 there were 51 children (17.8%) reporting suffering at least one lifetime episode of LBP who had not reported such an episode at T1. Only one parameter showed a statistical difference: New LBP was observed significantly more frequently in children who do not walk to school ( P<0.0001). An interesting point of this study is that a number of children who had reported a history of LBP at T1 did not do so at T2. It may be that LBP in children is so benign and its natural history so favourable that the memory of the episode fades away. It is extremely interesting to note that among the few significant variables, those related to general well-being and self-perception of health, are prominent. It appears, therefore, that psychological factors play a role in the experience of LBP in a similar way to what has been reported in adults. Poor self-perception of health (health belief) could be a factor behind the reporting of LBP. Some variables linked to consequences of LBP (absence from school or from gym and visit to a doctor) play a significant role in reporting LBP, which suggests that those "health care" factors may reinforce a feeling of disease severity.

Causality↗

Complex disease and the new clinical sciences.

Medical research today is dominated by a genocentric point of view. At the same time, clinical discovery and patient-oriented research have become less common. Here, I suggest that these developments are interdependent, each representing the flip side of an inaccurate view of how clinical advance occurs.

Causality↗