PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11096748

Tardive Dyskinesia.

Abstract

Although there are many published studies on the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD), relatively few treatments have proven to be consistently useful in clinical practice. Reviewed critically, most treatments have produced only slight to moderate benefit in less than half the patients treated. Emphasis instead is on prevention, prompt detection, and management of early and potentially reversible cases. If a patient develops dyskinesia while taking an antipsychotic drug (APD), ideal management is immediate discontinuation of the APD, if this is psychiatrically feasible. The manifestations of TD should be documented and the patient examined to exclude other possible causes of dyskinesia. APDs should then be withheld in the hope that the dyskinesia will disappear. Although the dyskinesia may fade within several weeks, it has the potential to recur if APD treatment is reintroduced. Psychiatric reevaluation to consider alternative psychiatric diagnoses or treatments is strongly advised. If there is no alternative to reintroducing an APD for psychiatric treatment, then an atypical neuroleptic should be considered. Because dyskinesia is very often not disturbing enough to require treatment, the need for treatment of TD should be carefully assessed. For mild dyskinesia, low doses of a benzodiazepine (eg, clonazepam) may reduce the amount of both dyskinesia and associated anxiety. Anticholinergic drugs are unhelpful and may aggravate TD but, similar to their effect in idiopathic dystonia, may be effective in tardive dystonia. Botulinum toxin injections are of considerable value in managing localized forms of tardive dystonia, such as retrocollis or blepharospasm. Tetrabenazine and reserpine are presynaptic dopamine depletors that may have considerable efficacy in TD, especially tardive dystonia; however, their use is often limited by side effects. Based on the rationale that TD may be due to formation of free radicals, vitamin E has been used for treatment of TD, with mixed results. In some patients with persistent and disabling TD that fails to remit even after the patient is no longer taking an APD, it may be necessary to resume treatment eventually with a typical APD. This approach should be considered only as a last resort to suppress TD, however, because it carries the risk of preventing remission and possibly aggravating TD. In this case, further attempts to taper and discontinue the APD are recommended. At present, there is no evidence that established TD continues to progress in severity with continued APD exposure. This nonprogressive character of TD may provide to be a consolation to the patient and family and is also of potential medical-legal importance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Tarsy. 2000. Tardive Dyskinesia.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0003-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗