PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11096761

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy.

Abstract

Before embarking on experimental therapies for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), the diagnosis needs to be unequivocally established. Improving the underlying immunodeficiency state is the best initial approach to the management of PML. Immunosuppressive therapies should be discontinued when feasible. In the patient with AIDS, highly active antiretroviral therapy should be administered; this appears to prolong survival. At present, no therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in a well-designed prospective trial. Cytosine arabinoside, which has demonstrated efficacy in vitro against JC virus, has not been effective when administered intravenously or intrathecally to patients with AIDS and PML. The failure of regimens employing cytosine arabinoside in PML may have been the consequence of inadequate penetration of the drug to sites of infection in the brain. Other drugs with established in vitro activity against JC virus, such as topoisomerase and camptothecin, are poorly tolerated. The use of cidofovir in patients with AIDS and PML remains anecdotal, although it is currently under investigation. Interferon alfa may improve survival in patients with AIDS and PML and may have general applicability to PML regardless of the cause of the underlying immunodeficient state. Approximately 7% to 9% of patients with PML demonstrate prolonged survival (>12 months) and associated improvement in clinical and radiographic abnormalities in the absence of specific therapy. In patients with AIDS-related PML, prolonged survival correlates with PML as the presenting manifestation of AIDS, higher CD4 T-lymphocyte counts, and contrast enhancement of PML lesions on radiographic imaging. A brisk inflammatory response may also be associated with improved survival. The increased understanding of the pathophysiology of JC virus provides hope for the development of curative strategies. The growing number of persons affected with PML has allowed the organization of carefully designed therapeutic trials to address this issue.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

JR Berger. 2000. Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0053-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗