PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11096769

Behçet's Disease.

Abstract

Clinical and imaging data suggest that Behçet's disease (BD) can present with a variety of neurologic complications, which may be subclassified into two forms. One is attributable to small venous inflammatory disease with focal or multifocal central nervous system involvement and is seen in the majority of patients. It is designated Central Nervous System-Neuro-Behçet syndrome (CNS-NBS). The other form is due to cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and has limited symptoms and a better prognosis. It is very uncommon for these two types of involvement to occur in the same individual. It is very likely that the two major forms have different pathogeneses. Patients with small vein inflammation should be considered for aggressive treatment. A substantial number of patients in this group will have a relapsing-remitting course; for some, this will evolve into a secondary progressive course. A few patients from this group will have progressive CNS dysfunction from the onset. Acute attacks of CNS-NBS are treated with either oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/d up to 4 weeks or until improvement is observed) or high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), 1 g/d for 5 to 7 days. After either treatment, an oral tapering dose of glucocorticoids should be given over 2 to 3 months to avoid early relapses. Some patients may require the long-term use of low maintenance doses of glucocorticoids to prevent exacerbations. Immunosuppressive agents (eg, azathioprine, cyclosporine A, cyclophosphamide, and chlorambucil), given either alone or in different combinations (eg, azathioprine with cyclosporine) for the long-term treatment of various systemic manifestations of BD, have not been shown to prevent the development of the neurologic complications of the disease, reduce its exacerbations, or stop its progression. Immunomodulatory treatments such as interferon alfa and thalidomide have been shown to be effective in treating some of the systemic manifestations of BD, but there is no information on their effects on the development and progression of CNS-NBS. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in BD is treated with either intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin given together with a short course of glucocorticoids. Evidence of benefit from this treatment, however, is weak.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Siva, I Fresko. 2000. Behçet's Disease.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0042-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗