PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11096777

Primary Generalized Epilepsies.

Abstract

For pure childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), ethosuximide (ESM) remains the drug of first choice. Although valproic acid (VPA) is of equal efficacy, it is more toxic, and is reserved for those patients with accompanying convulsions. Lamotrigine (LTG) is effective as both add-on and monotherapy for CAE. If any of these three drugs fails, one of the other two can be used as monotherapy. Rarely, when ESM, VPA, or LTG does not effectively control CAE, phenytoin (PHT), primidone (PRM), and phenobarbital (PB) may be partially effective, although carbamazepine (CBZ) may worsen absence seizures. Experience is limited with the newer AEDs. Tiagabine (TGB) may induce absence status epilepticus in PGE. Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and vigabatrin (VGB) may worsen absence seizures. Felbamate (FBM) is probably effective, but is potentially fatal. Lifelong therapy is not anticipated. For juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), VPA is the drug of first choice. LTG is also of proven efficacy. The risks of VPA-induced teratogenicity (possibly lessened by the concurrent use of folic acid) and weight gain are potentially unacceptable in young women of childbearing age. Not enough data exists on the safety of LTG in pregnancy. A combination of VPA and LTG can be used if either drug alone is unsuccessful. For juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), VPA is the traditional drug of first choice in most patients. As in JAE, side effects may make VPA an unacceptable choice in many patients, especially young women. In clinical practice, TPM is being increasingly used as monotherapy for JME. Many patients appreciate the accompanying weight loss seen with TPM, but it has potentially troubling side effects, has not been well studied as monotherapy for JME, and its safety in pregnancy has yet to be confirmed. PHT and CBZ may worsen myoclonus when used alone, but they may have a role as add-on treatment to VPA, LTG, or TPM, especially when generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCSs) are not controlled. PB and PRM may also be useful as add-on treatment, but often have unacceptable side effects. Clonazepam may be useful as adjunctive treatment for resistant myoclonic jerks. OXC and VGB both worsen myoclonic seizures. GBP is not useful in JME and can make seizures worse. The efficacy of FBM and TGB in JME is largely unknown. Lifelong AED therapy is necessary. In epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) on awakening (EGA), VPA is the drug of choice, especially if other seizure types (absence and myoclonic) are present. If only GTCSs are present, then PB, PHT, and CBZ may be as effective as VPA; however, the use of PHT and CBZ may "unearth" other seizure types (absence and myoclonic) in those patients with EGA, although PB is poorly tolerated. As for JME, LTG, and TPM may both be effective monotherapy for EGA, although the use of other AEDs in EGA has not been well studied. Lifelong AED treatment is necessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Murphy, N Delanty. 2000. Primary Generalized Epilepsies.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-000-0031-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗