PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11098867

It has to be about choice.

Abstract

My time in the mental health system began a little over 20 years ago, when I was seven. Over the past eight years I have been fighting for, demanding that, respect and ethics play a part in psychology and all that falls under it. I realized that for all the reasons that have been given, for all the excuses that have been made, for a long time I acted as little more than an apologist for a system that refused to change. I learned that it is impossible to make any great systemic changes without the change being wanted-no matter how warranted it is. A system may desperately need to be overhauled, gutted out, and rebuilt. However, inside of that system are the people who work for it, who need the consistency that they have become used to. Psychology, to me, is a self-perpetuating institution. It creates the laws and then defines who breaks them. I am no longer an apologist for the mental health system. Candidly, I have not yet learned how to put a pretty bow on all of my views, which are a direct result of my voluntary and involuntary time in the system. both personally and professionally. All I know is that it has to be about choice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L J Tenney. 2000. It has to be about choice.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(200011)56%3A11%3C1433%3A%3Aaid-jclp6%3E3.0.co%3B2-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A compensation election for binary social choice.

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.

Choice Behavior↗

The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.

Long waiting times for inpatient treatment in the UK National Health Service have been a source of popular and political concern, and therefore a target for policy initiatives. In the London Patient Choice Project, patients at risk of breaching inpatient waiting time targets were offered the choice of an alternative hospital with a guaranteed shorter wait. This paper develops a simple theoretical model of the effect of greater patient choice on waiting times. It then uses a difference in difference econometric methodology to estimate the impact of the London choice project on ophthalmology waiting times. In line with the model predictions, the project led to shorter average waiting times in the London region and a convergence in waiting times amongst London hospitals.

Choice Behavior↗