PubMed · 11104079
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K A Henderson, I P Matthews. 2000-11-11. Nitrous oxide.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11104079/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The objective of this follow-up study was to verify the efficacy of the technical adjustments gradually introduced in departments of a viscose rayon factory from 1989 onward. Personal exposure to carbon disulphide was assessed by means of personal monitoring through active sampling. Six job titles in three departments of the factory were sampled. Geometric means were calculated and used as estimates of time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations. The results from the present study were compared with similar measurements from a previous study in the same factory. Due to organizational changes, only three job titles (spinner, first spinner, and viscose preparator) could be compared directly. Two new job titles were identified, although tasks performed in these two job titles already existed. The measurements from one job title could not be compared, due to a substantial reorganization and automation of the tasks carried out in the department. The comparison before and after technical improvements shows that personal exposure of spinner and first spinner has been substantially reduced. Even the geometric means of measurements outside the fresh air mask are below the TWA-TLV (Threshold Limit Value). Despite the difficulties in comparing the results from the two studies, it is concluded that the technical measures reduced up to tenfold personal exposure to carbon disulphide and personal protection reduced it further by a factor two.
Work practice studies were conducted involving the removal of asbestos-containing sheet gaskets from steam flanges. These studies were performed to determine potential exposure levels to individuals who have worked with these types of materials in the past and may still work with these products today. The work practices were conducted inside an exposure characterization laboratory (ECL) and were performed by scraping and wire brushing, chrysotile-containing (65% to 85%) sheet gaskets from a number of used steam flanges. Airborne asbestos levels were measured by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for the personnel and area air samples collected during the study. These workplace simulations showed substantial asbestos fiber release using scraping, hand wire brushing, and power wire brushing techniques during the gasket removal process. The range of concentration was 2.1 to 31.0 fibers/cc greater than 5 micrometers when measured by PCM. These results contrasted with the few reported results in the published literature where lower airborne asbestos levels were reported. In these studies the airborne asbestos fiber levels measured in many of the samples exceeded all current and historical Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) excursion limits (15-30 minutes) and some previous permissible exposure limits (PEL) based on eight-hour time-weighted average (TWA) standards. Also, individuals who performed this type of work in the past may have had exposures higher than previously suspected. The results demonstrated that employees who remove dry asbestos-containing gaskets with no localized ventilation should wear a full face supplied air respirator with a HEPA escape canister and the work area should be designated a regulated area.