PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11108701

Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons.

R Alves·M A Savageau
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The method of mathematically controlled comparison has been used for some time to determine which of two alternative regulatory designs is better according to specific quantitative criteria for functional effectiveness. In some cases, the results obtained using this technique are general and independent of parameter values and the answers are clear-cut. In others, the result might be general, but the demonstration is difficult and numerical results with specific parameter values can help to clarify the situation. In either case, numerical results with specific parameter values can also provide an answer to the question of how much larger the values might be. In contrast, a more ambiguous result is obtained when either of the alternatives can have the larger value for a given systemic property, depending on the specific values of the parameters. In any case, introduction of specific values for the parameters reduces the generality of the results. Therefore, we have been motivated to develop and apply statistical methods that would permit the use of numerical values for the parameters and yet retain some of the generality that makes mathematically controlled comparison so attractive. RESULTS: We illustrate this new numerical method in a step-by-step application using a very simple didactic example. We also validate the results by comparison with the corresponding results obtained using the previously developed analytical method. The analytical approach is briefly present for reference purposes, since some of the same key concepts are needed to understand the numerical method and the results are needed for comparison. The numerical method confirms the qualitative differences between the systemic behavior of alternative designs obtained from the analytical method. In addition, the numerical method allows for quantification of the differences and it provides results that are general in a statistical sense. For example, the older analytical method showed that overall feedback inhibition in an unbranched pathway makes the system more robust whereas it decreases the stability margin of the steady state. The numerical method shows that the magnitudes of these differences are not comparable. The differences in stability margins (1-2% on average) are small when compared to the differences in robustness (50-100% on average). Furthermore, the numerical method shows that the system with overall feedback responds more quickly to change than the otherwise equivalent system without overall feedback. These results suggest reasons why overall feedback inhibition is such a prevalent regulatory pattern in unbranched biosynthetic pathways.

Explore related subjects

Computational BiologyComputer SimulationMathematical ComputingModels, BiologicalNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Alves, M A Savageau. 2000. Extending the method of mathematically controlled comparison to include numerical comparisons.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics%2F16.9.786

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Phage bioinformatics tools: a review of computational approaches for bacteriophage research.

Rising clinical interest in phage therapy and the exponential growth of metagenomic sequence catalogues have driven a rapid expansion of bacteriophage bioinformatics. More than 80 dedicated tools, mostly published since 2020, now span identification, assembly, annotation, taxonomy, lifestyle prediction, defence-system detection, and host prediction. Aimed at experienced practitioners and developers, this review synthesizes the field through the lens of three successive computational paradigms: sequence homology, bounded by database completeness; machine learning, constrained by labelled training data; and foundation models, which now achieve Matthews correlation coefficients above 0.95 in identification tasks and, through structure-informed prediction, raise functional annotation to over half of phage genes. Furthermore, we map the upstream components, namely, gene callers, homology engines, protein language models, and structural search tools, that underpin most downstream pipelines, exposing shared infrastructure and ecosystem-level fragility when dependencies change. To translate this into practice, we propose web-based and command-line reference workflows calibrated to user expertise and sample types. Finally, we set an agenda for the next wave of tool development. Roughly half of phage genes still resist functional annotation despite structural methods; no broadly generalizable strain-level host predictor exists for phage therapy; varying true-positive rates (0%-97%) underscore the absence of standardized community benchmarks analogous to Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction or Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation. As generative genome models begin designing synthetic phages, progress will depend less on producing standalone tools than on rigorous evaluation, interoperable infrastructure, and clinically meaningful prediction targets.

Computational Biology↗
PubMed2026

Collective posterior inference from highly variable empirical replicates.

High-throughput experimental platforms now routinely generate data from dozens or hundreds of independent observations. Simulation-based inference (SBI) offers a powerful framework for estimating model parameters from such complex datasets, but standard methods struggle to scale to the noisy multiple-replicates regime without incurring prohibitive computational costs or careful hyperparameter tuning. Here, we introduce a new method for fast and robust collective posterior inference from multiple independent replicates using a robust product-of-experts aggregation scheme that automatically mitigates the influence of outliers. Evaluating it on synthetic and empirical evolutionary datasets, we find it achieves state-of-the-art estimation accuracy and computational efficiency, including inference from noisy observations. Our method is compatible with any SBI framework, providing a scalable, plug-and-play solution for inference from noisy multiple-replicate datasets.

Computational Biology↗
PubMed2026

ReGAIN: a bioinformatics platform for assessing probabilistic co-occurrence between resistance genes in bacterial pathogens.

MOTIVATION: Multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens continue to rise globally, yet scalable methods are needed to infer how resistance determinants co-occur across pathogen populations and to quantify conditional dependencies underlying co-occurrence and shared genetic context. RESULTS: We present ReGAIN (Resistance Gene Association and Inference Network), an open-source platform that applies Bayesian network structure learning to infer probabilistic, conditional dependency relationships among antibiotic resistance, heavy metal tolerance, stress response, and virulence determinants in bacteria. In contrast to pairwise co-occurrence analyses, ReGAIN reports conditional probabilities, relative risks, and absolute risk differences with confidence intervals to prioritize candidate relationships for downstream prioritization. Applied across ESKAPEE pathogens, ReGAIN recapitulated established resistance gene relationships and identified additional candidate patterns consistent with co-selection and shared genetic context. Together, these results support scalable, reproducible population-wide analysis of resistance networks for surveillance, comparative genomics and epidemiology. AVAILABILITY: ReGAIN analyses are performed using Python v3.11.5 and R v4.4.1 and is available as open-source software through Bioconda at {https://anaconda.org/bioconda/regain-cli}. Source code and documentation can be found at {https://github.com/ERBringHorvath/regain_CLI}. All genomes used in this publication were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database. Large supplementary tables and results data from the ESKAPEE pathogen example network analyses can be downloaded from https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/ReGAIN_command_line_software_and_supplemental_figures_/28959431.

Computational Biology↗