PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11113464

Strategies and testing methods for identifying mutagenic risks.

Abstract

The evolution of testing strategies and methods for identification of mutagenic agents is discussed, beginning with the concern over potential health and population effects of chemical mutagens in the late 1940s that led to the development of regulatory guidelines for mutagenicity testing in the 1970s and 1980s. Efforts to achieve international harmonization of mutagenicity testing guidelines are summarized, and current issues and needs in the field are discussed, including the need for quantitative methods of mutagenic risk assessment, dose-response thresholds, indirect mechanisms of mutagenicity, and the predictivity of mutagenicity assays for carcinogenicity in vivo. Speculation is offered about the future of mutagenicity testing, including possible near-term changes in standard test batteries and the longer-term roles of expression profiling of damage-response genes, in vivo mutagenicity testing methods, and models that better account for differences in metabolism between humans and laboratory model systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J T MacGregor, D Casciano, L Müller. 2000-11-20. Strategies and testing methods for identifying mutagenic risks.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00116-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Expression of Smad4 in the FaDu cell line partially restores TGF-beta growth inhibition but is not sufficient to regulate fibronectin expression or suppress tumorigenicity.

Mutations of the Smad4 gene, a member of a group of TGF-beta signal transduction components, occur in several types of cancer suggesting that its inactivation significantly affects TGF-beta responsiveness in these tumors. To further investigate the role of Smad4 with respect to TGF-beta signaling and carcinogenesis, we re-expressed the Smad4 gene in the Smad4-deficient cancer cell line FaDu by microcell-mediated chromosome transfer (MMCT) and retroviral infection to closely approximate physiological protein levels. The Smad4-expressing FaDu clones were then evaluated for TGF-beta responsiveness to assess the role of Smad4 in TGF-beta-induced growth inhibition and target gene regulation. We found that the re-expression of the Smad4 gene by either method partially restored TGF-beta responsiveness in FaDu cells with respect to both growth inhibition and expression of p21WAF1/CIP1 and p15INK4B. However, only the microcell hybrids showed growth retardation in organotypic raft culture and an enhanced ability to upregulate fibronectin. In contrast, the re-expression of Smad4 by either method failed to suppress tumorigenicity. These results suggest that in addition to a homozygous deletion of Smad4, FaDu cells contain additional defects within the TGF-beta signaling pathway, thereby limiting the extent of TGF-beta responsiveness upon Smad4 re-expression and perhaps accounting for the inability to induce p15INK4B to a high level. They also demonstrate the advantages of providing a physiological extracellular environment, when assessing TGFbeta responsiveness.

Carcinogenicity Tests↗