PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11115016

Clinical supervision as an emancipatory process: avoiding inappropriate intent.

Abstract

As clinical supervision becomes more widely implemented in the United Kingdom with concerns and resistances being eroded as practitioners discover its benefits, it is important that potential limitations and perhaps failures are avoided. This paper utilizes Johns' (1996) intent-emphasis axis to explore how a technical interest, misunderstanding of expert practice, and confusion of self awareness with counselling, can detract from the supervisory process. Several of the criticisms of reflective practice will be examined to demonstrate where concerns are valid and where they may be based on misunderstandings and the need to control clinical supervision. Greater awareness of inappropriate emphasis and intent should enable even relatively inexperienced supervisors to help their supervisees move towards independence, emancipation and evolving expertise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Heath, D Freshwater. 2000. Clinical supervision as an emancipatory process: avoiding inappropriate intent.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01600.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗