PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11117481

Fast temporal interactions in human auditory cortex.

Abstract

The temporal resolution of the human primary auditory cortex (AC) was studied using middle-latency evoked fields. Paired sounds with either the same or different spectral characteristics were presented with gaps between the sounds of 1, 4, 8 and 14 ms. Spatio-temporal modelling showed (1) that the response to the second sound was recognizable with gaps of 1 ms and rapidly increased in amplitude with increasing gap durations, (2) an enhanced N40m amplitude at gaps > 4 ms, (3) delayed N19m-P30m latencies when the stimuli were different. The median psychoacoustical thresholds were 1.6 ms for the same stimuli and 2.5 ms for different stimuli, confirming the electrophysiological evidence for rapid pattern-specific temporal processing in human primary auditory cortex.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Rupp, S Hack, A Gutschalk, P Schneider, T W Picton, C Stippich, M Scherg. 2000-11-27. Fast temporal interactions in human auditory cortex.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200011270-00028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Redefining the tonotopic core of rat auditory cortex: physiological evidence for a posterior field.

Previous physiological studies have identified a tonotopically organized primary auditory cortical field (AI) in the rat. Some of this prior research suggests that the rat, like other mammals, may have additional fields surrounding AI. We, therefore, recorded in the Sprague-Dawley rat extracellular responses of single neurons throughout AI, and continued posteriorly to verify the existence of a posterior field (P) and to compare the neuronal properties in the two regions. Acoustic stimuli, including tones, bandpass noise, broadband noise, and temporally modulated stimuli, were delivered dichotically via sealed systems. Consistent with previous findings, AI was characterized by an anterior-to-posterior tonotopic progression from high to low frequencies (ranging from >40 kHz to <1 kHz). A frequency reversal at the posterior border of AI marked entry into a second core tonotopic region, P, with progressively higher frequencies encountered further posteriorly, up to a point (approximately 8 kHz) where cells were no longer tone responsive. Nevertheless, bandpass noise was an effective stimulus in P, enabling characterization of cells up to 15 kHz. Compared with AI, the frequency tuning of response areas was relatively broader in P, the response latency was often longer and more variable, and the response magnitude was more commonly a nonmonotonic function of stimulus level. In both fields, most neurons were binaurally influenced. The presence of multiple auditory cortical fields in the rat is consistent with auditory cortical organization in other mammals. Moreover, the response properties of P relative to AI in the rat also resemble those found in other mammals. Finally, the physiological data suggest that core auditory cortex (temporal area TE1) is composed not only of AI as previously thought, but also of at least two other subdivisions, P and an anterior field (A). Furthermore, our physiological characterization of TE1 reveals that it is larger than suggested by previous anatomical characterizations.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Noninvasive cardiovascular markers of acoustically induced arousal from non-rapid-eye-movement sleep.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Changes in cardiovascular measures such as heart rate (HR) and pulse transit time (PTT) have been advocated as sensitive markers of autonomic arousal from sleep. In animal studies, alerting stimuli produce particularly marked skin vascular responses. We hypothesized that changes in skin vascular conductance would provide more sensitive markers of autonomic arousal during sleep compared to central cardiovascular response measures such as HR and PTT. DESIGN: Cardiovascular responses to auditory-induced arousals were recorded during overnight sleep studies. SETTING: Sleep disorders unit in a 270-bed teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven young healthy male subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Throughout ovemight sleep studies, auditory tones (5-second duration, 54-90 decibels, 22-56 per subject) were presented during non-rapid-eye-movement sleep. Beat-by-beat HR, PTT, laser-Doppler fingertip skin blood flow (SBF) and finger and ear photoplethysmogram pulse wave amplitudes (PWA) were measured in the 20 seconds preceding and 30 seconds following each tone and compared to control measurements obtained during 50-second periods of recording with no stimulus (no tone, 6-22 per subject). Electroencephalographic (EEG) arousals were scored according to standard criteria (American Sleep Disorders Association) into no discemible, 3- to 10-second duration, or 10- to 15-second duration arousals. Poststimulus cardiovascular measurements were expressed as a percentage of the prestimulus mean and response magnitudes quantified from peak responses and the area under the poststimulus response curve. The ability of each cardiovascular response measure to discriminate EEG arousals (EEG changes lasting more than 3 seconds) was assessed from the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There were no significant changes in any cardiovascular parameter during control recordings. In contrast to all other parameters, finger PWA and SBF decreased following tones that produced no discernible EEG arousal (P < 0.05). A significant HR rise and decreases in all cardiovascular measures occurred with greater than 3-second arousals, with longer duration arousals generally exhibiting larger responses. Conventional EEG arousals (greater than 3 seconds) were relatively poorly detected from HR responses (ROC area HR rise 0.80 +/- 0.04) compared to changes in SBF (0.85 +/- 0.02), PTT (0.85 +/- 0.03) and finger PWA (0.90 +/- 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Decreases in skin vascular conductance (finger PWA and SBF) provide sensitive markers of autonomic arousal during sleep. They are at least as sensitive as PTT for detecting conventionally scored EEG arousals and may be more sensitive in detecting "subcortical" arousals.

Acoustic Stimulation↗