PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11127176

What can general practice learn from complementary medicine?

Abstract

Complementary medicine is popular in Britain. This suggests that patients who use complementary medicine believe that there are deficiencies in the care they receive from their general practitioners (GPs). Studies of patients using complementary medicine have shown that these patients are sometimes dissatisfied with the communication skills of conventional doctors, the explanations they give for their illnesses, the dangers of modern drugs, and a perceived lack of holistic care. The patients using complementary medicine trusted their bodies' own healing potential and they generally believed that they had more control over their bodies than those patients who did not use complementary medicine. They particularly valued the longer appointment times usually given by the complementary therapists and also the in-depth discussions of their illnesses. Patients using complementary medicine tended to be those with chronic illnesses and these patients particularly valued the positive approach of, and the psychological support given by, the complementary therapists. General practitioners know that all of these aspects of care are important, but the fact that many of our patients go to complementary therapists to satisfy them should encourage us to look at our own practices to see how we as GPs can fulfill these needs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P White. 2000. What can general practice learn from complementary medicine?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11127176/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗