PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11129685

Optimizing antiplatelet therapy in coronary interventions.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention has had a dramatic impact on the current practice of cardiology. One of its important limitations, however, is the potential for producing unfavorable outcomes such as acute coronary closure following angioplasty or atherectomy or subacute thrombosis following stent implantation. These complications may lead to death, myocardial infarction, or the need for urgent bypass surgery. One mechanism underlying these clinical events is platelet-mediated thrombosis due to arterial trauma. Therapeutically, platelet activation by thromboxane and adenosine diphosphate (ADP), as well as platelet aggregation by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) receptors, has been inhibited with various pharmacologic agents. c7E3 (abciximab), a monoclonal antibody directed against GPIIb/IIIa, has been shown to have potent effects on reducing both acute and subacute complications. Other parenteral GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, including peptide and small nonpeptide molecules, have also been found to be clinically effective. Oral versions of similar drugs are currently being evaluated, but several have resulted in disappointing efficacy and safety profiles and have failed to show advantages over aspirin. With all antiplatelet agents, in particular GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, bleeding and vascular complications must be addressed. Inhibition of thromboxane-induced platelet activation with aspirin has been standard therapy for angioplasty and in the global management of vascular disease. Newer agents that block ADP-mediated platelet activation, the thienopyridines, have been found to be synergistic to aspirin in their effects on the complications of coronary intervention. Ticlopidine and, more recently, clopidogrel, in conjunction with aspirin, have become standard therapies for preventing subacute thrombosis after stent implantation. Large-scale clinical trials are ongoing to optimize their use in combination with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S B King. 2000. Optimizing antiplatelet therapy in coronary interventions.. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960231104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ventricular septal rupture following abciximab infusion.

Ventricular septal rupture is a rare complication of myocardial infarction. Despite a significant reduction in its incidence with reperfusion therapy, thrombolysis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of septal rupture. There is little information regarding the impact of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor blockers on ventricular septal rupture. We report a case of rupture of the ventricular septum occurring after treatment with the glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor blocker abciximab, in the absence of thrombolysis.

Abciximab↗

Thrombus predicts ischemic complications during percutaneous coronary intervention in saphenous vein grafts: results from TARGET (do Tirofiban and ReoPro give similar efficacy trial?).

BACKGROUND: Saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) carries a high risk of ischemic complications. However, there are scant recent data to identify which SVG lesions carry particularly high risk in recent years. We studied demographic and angiographic factors associated with ischemic complications after SVG PCI without distal protection in the TARGET (do tirofiban and reopro give similar efficacy trial?) study. METHODS: TARGET was a multicenter double-dummy, double-blinded study randomizing 4,809 PCI patients to tirofiban or abciximab. Of these, 254 patients underwent PCI involving an SVG lesion. The primary endpoint of this analysis was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 30 days, including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: No demographic characteristic was associated with 30-day MACE. Lesion length > 20 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, P = 0.03), thrombus (OR = 3.9, P = 0.003), eccentricity (P = 0.001), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow < 3 post-procedure (OR = 5.6, P = 0.037), and >1 target lesion (OR = 2.5, P = 0.035) were univariate variables associated with 30-day MACE. Multivariate analysis associated only thrombus (OR = 3.8, P = 0.015) with 30-day MACE. No difference in outcomes was noted between patients receiving abciximab and tirofiban. SVG patients had lesser angiographic success (95.6% vs. 98%, P = 0.04) and increased 30-day Q-wave MI (2.5% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.039) compared with non-SVG patients, but a similar incidence of death (0% vs. 0.4%), non-Q-MI (5.9% vs. 4.5%), and target vessel revascularization (0.5% vs. 1%). CONCLUSION: In the era of routine stenting and GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors, thrombus is the angiographic characteristic most closely associated with adverse outcomes of SVG PCI.

Abciximab↗

Rationale for intracoronary administration of abciximab.

The present review aims to describe the pharmacological aspects as well as the available clinical data supporting the choice of intracoronary route of administration for abciximab, an antiplatelet drug used in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Abciximab is a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist which determines a potent inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. These properties seem to prevent not only thrombus formation but also to promote (at higher drug concentration) lysis of fresh thrombus. Moreover, differently from the other GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, abciximab also binds to the vitronectin receptor on endothelial, smooth muscle, and inflammatory cells and to an activated conformation of the aMb2 receptor on leukocytes. Such cross-reactivity raises the possibility that clinical benefits derived from its use may not be exclusively due to its anti-thrombotic effect, but may also be related to the suppression of inflammatory pathways involving platelets, white blood cells, and the vascular endothelium. On such basis, the local administration of abciximab at the site of coronary thrombosis may enhance, by increasing its local concentration, the binding to both platelet and endothelium receptors. The results of several angiographic studies assessing the effect of intracoronary abciximab administration support on clinical grounds its adoption in patients with fresh coronary thrombosis. Indeed, better post-angioplasty coronary flow, greater degree of myocardial salvage and a better left ventricular function recovery have been achieved as compared to the intravenous, systemic, administration of drug's bolus. Condensed Abstract Several studies have highlighted the benefits of abciximab, a potent antiplatelet agent, in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Moreover, differently from the other glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, abciximab also has non-IIb/IIIa-related properties raising the possibility that clinical benefits derived from its use may not be exclusively due to its anti-thrombotic effect, but may also be related to the suppression of inflammatory pathways. Several angiographic studies in patients with fresh coronary thrombosis and recent clinical studies in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing mechanical revascularization support the hypothesis that local administration of abciximab at the site of the culprit coronary artery may facilitate both the de-thrombotic and the non-GP IIb/IIIa-dependent properties of the drug. On such basis, the present review aims to describe the pharmacological aspects as well as the available clinical data supporting the choice of intracoronary route of administration for abciximab.

Abciximab↗