PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11136421

Diary data enhancing rigour: analysis framework and verification tool.

A M Clayton·T Thorne
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper outlines a stage-by-stage framework for the analysis of data obtained from qualitative semistructured diaries. As the framework for analysis was developed, it became apparent that the methodological problem of verifying the initial analysis, required serious consideration. The research literature available was found simply to identify the difficulty, but offered no solutions. Recognizing that trustworthiness is a hallmark of qualitative research, a data analysis verification tool (DAViT) was designed. This proved to be extremely effective in enhancing the trustworthiness of a qualitative study in a number of ways. The analysis framework and verification tool together offers an eclectic approach for qualitative diary data analysis. It is further advocated that they are amenable to the analysis and verification of qualitative data obtained from semistructured interviews.

Explore related subjects

Data CollectionData Interpretation, StatisticalEpisode of CareFemaleHumansMedical RecordsMothersNursing ResearchPower, PsychologicalPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A M Clayton, T Thorne. 2000. Diary data enhancing rigour: analysis framework and verification tool.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01609.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Academic geriatric programs in US allopathic and osteopathic medical schools.

CONTEXT: By 2030, 20% of the US population will be older than 65 years compared with 12.4% in 2000. The development of geriatric medicine research and training programs to prepare for this increasing number of older individuals is largely dependent on the successful establishment of academic geriatric medicine programs in medical schools. OBJECTIVE: To assess the structure, resources, and activities of academic geriatric medicine programs in US allopathic and osteopathic schools of medicine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey distributed to the academic geriatric medicine leaders of the 144 US allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in March 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Organizational structure, program information, curriculum, budgetary issues, and characteristics of academic geriatric medicine leaders. RESULTS: A total of 121 program directors (84%) responded. Most schools (87%) had an identifiable academic geriatric program structure, with 67% established after 1984. The greatest proportion of faculty and staff time (40%) was spent in clinical practice, followed by research and scholarship (12%), residency and fellowship education (10% each), and medical student education (7.8%). Clinical practice accounted for the greatest portion (27%) of revenue, and 25.7% of the programs had total annual budgets of less than $250,000, while 11% had budgets of greater than $5 million. The largest obstacles to achieving the goals of an academic geriatric medicine program were a lack of research faculty and fellows and poor clinical reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Most US medical schools have an identifiable academic geriatric medicine program; most have been established within the last 15 years. Resources are needed to train faculty for roles as teachers and researchers and to develop medical school geriatric programs of the size and scope equivalent to other academic disciplines.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2002

Impact of speech recognition on radiologist productivity.

A survey was conducted of radiology practices with productivity data from at least 3 of the following 4 workflows: film with manual transcription, filmless with manual transcription, film with speech recognition, and filmless with speech recognition. Two surveys were submitted to candidate sites. The first was used to ascertain suitable available data for follow-up. The second survey requested data for report turn around times, full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing levels, and report volume. Data were collected and stored in a Microsoft Access database and statistical analysis performed in Excel. Whereas several metrics were used, the normalized figure of reports-per-day/FTE was found to have improved an average of 1.9 (for filmless with speech recognition) and 2.3 (for film with speech recognition) over the film with manual transcription case. Filmless with manual transcription was only 1.4 times the value of the all manual case. At the 10% confidence level, both filmless with manual transcription and film with speech recognition workflows were found to have statistically significant enhanced productivity. Insufficient data exist to show if the fully automated workflow (filmless with speech recognition) offers benefits over 2 previous semiautomated workflows.

Data Collection↗